How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment

Background. High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the phys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Thomas, Riddhi Joshi, Grant Cave
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Critical Care Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6036891
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563172056236032
author Martin Thomas
Riddhi Joshi
Grant Cave
author_facet Martin Thomas
Riddhi Joshi
Grant Cave
author_sort Martin Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Background. High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the physiological effects observed. Objectives. (1) To review the available literature on the effects of HFT on airway pressure and indices of gas exchange. (2) To quantify PEEP generated by a HFT  circuit. Methods. A randomised benchtop experiment was conducted, with a size 8 uncuffed Portex tracheostomy connected to an Optiflow™ with Airvo 2™ humidifier system. The tracheostomy tube was partially immersed in water to give rise to a column of water within the inner surface of the tube. An air fluid interface was generated with flows of 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min. The amount of potential PEEP (pPEEP) generated was determined by the distance the water column was pushed downward by the flow delivered. Findings. Overall 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min provided pPEEP of approximately 0.3 cmH2O, 0.5 cmH2O, and 0.9 cmH2O, respectively. There was a statistically significant change in pPEEP with change in flows from 40–60 L/min with an average change in pPEEP of 0.25–0.35 cmH2O per 10 L/min flow (p value <0.01). Interpretation. HFT  can generate measurable and variable PEEP despite the open system used. The pPEEP generated with HFT is minimal despite statistically significant change with increasing flows. This pPEEP is unlikely to provide mechanical benefit in weaning patients off ventilatory support.
format Article
id doaj-art-a66a6338b06442468bcd3bb082cff00f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1305
2090-1313
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Critical Care Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-a66a6338b06442468bcd3bb082cff00f2025-02-03T01:20:48ZengWileyCritical Care Research and Practice2090-13052090-13132021-01-01202110.1155/2021/60368916036891How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop ExperimentMartin Thomas0Riddhi Joshi1Grant Cave2Department of Cardiology, Dubbo Base Hospital, Dubbo, NSW 2830, AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Dubbo Base Hospital, Dubbo, NSW 2830, AustraliaDubbo Base Hospital, Dubbo, NSW 2830, AustraliaBackground. High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the physiological effects observed. Objectives. (1) To review the available literature on the effects of HFT on airway pressure and indices of gas exchange. (2) To quantify PEEP generated by a HFT  circuit. Methods. A randomised benchtop experiment was conducted, with a size 8 uncuffed Portex tracheostomy connected to an Optiflow™ with Airvo 2™ humidifier system. The tracheostomy tube was partially immersed in water to give rise to a column of water within the inner surface of the tube. An air fluid interface was generated with flows of 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min. The amount of potential PEEP (pPEEP) generated was determined by the distance the water column was pushed downward by the flow delivered. Findings. Overall 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min provided pPEEP of approximately 0.3 cmH2O, 0.5 cmH2O, and 0.9 cmH2O, respectively. There was a statistically significant change in pPEEP with change in flows from 40–60 L/min with an average change in pPEEP of 0.25–0.35 cmH2O per 10 L/min flow (p value <0.01). Interpretation. HFT  can generate measurable and variable PEEP despite the open system used. The pPEEP generated with HFT is minimal despite statistically significant change with increasing flows. This pPEEP is unlikely to provide mechanical benefit in weaning patients off ventilatory support.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6036891
spellingShingle Martin Thomas
Riddhi Joshi
Grant Cave
How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
Critical Care Research and Practice
title How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
title_full How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
title_fullStr How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
title_full_unstemmed How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
title_short How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment
title_sort how much peep does high flow deliver via tracheostomy a literature review and benchtop experiment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6036891
work_keys_str_mv AT martinthomas howmuchpeepdoeshighflowdeliverviatracheostomyaliteraturereviewandbenchtopexperiment
AT riddhijoshi howmuchpeepdoeshighflowdeliverviatracheostomyaliteraturereviewandbenchtopexperiment
AT grantcave howmuchpeepdoeshighflowdeliverviatracheostomyaliteraturereviewandbenchtopexperiment