Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing

The growing production of plastic waste and its recycling, from a circular economy perspective, faces challenges in finding solutions that are easy to implement, cheap in labor and energy during recycling, and locally implementable to avoid transportation. This work developed and validated a methodo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Pires, Martim Lima de Aguiar, André Costa Vieira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/26
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588294017253376
author Pedro Pires
Martim Lima de Aguiar
André Costa Vieira
author_facet Pedro Pires
Martim Lima de Aguiar
André Costa Vieira
author_sort Pedro Pires
collection DOAJ
description The growing production of plastic waste and its recycling, from a circular economy perspective, faces challenges in finding solutions that are easy to implement, cheap in labor and energy during recycling, and locally implementable to avoid transportation. This work developed and validated a methodology to address these challenges. Designed for small-scale use at home or in schools following a Do It Yourself (DIY) approach, it transforms water bottles into plastic strips, which, after passing through an extruder nozzle, become filaments with a diameter of 1.75 mm. These can replace commercially available thermoplastic filaments. Specimens produced by additive manufacturing with recycled PET (rPET) and commercial PETG showed similar mechanical properties and can serve as alternatives to commercial PETG. PETG shows higher strength (30 MPa) compared to rPET (24 MPa), a slightly higher Young’s modulus of 1.44 GPa versus 1.43 GPa, and greater strain at failure with 0.03 mm/mm against 0.02 mm/mm, making it stiffer and more ductile. This simple and widely applicable local solution may absorb a considerable amount of bottle waste, offering an economical, sustainable alternative to commercial filaments.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4cc9a9a35324a3da45064798740e7d5
institution Kabale University
issn 2504-4494
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
spelling doaj-art-a4cc9a9a35324a3da45064798740e7d52025-01-24T13:36:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942025-01-01912610.3390/jmmp9010026Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive ManufacturingPedro Pires0Martim Lima de Aguiar1André Costa Vieira2Center for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies (C-MAST-UBI), University of Beira Interior, Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama St., 6201-001 Covilhã, PortugalCenter for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies (C-MAST-UBI), University of Beira Interior, Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama St., 6201-001 Covilhã, PortugalCenter for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies (C-MAST-UBI), University of Beira Interior, Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama St., 6201-001 Covilhã, PortugalThe growing production of plastic waste and its recycling, from a circular economy perspective, faces challenges in finding solutions that are easy to implement, cheap in labor and energy during recycling, and locally implementable to avoid transportation. This work developed and validated a methodology to address these challenges. Designed for small-scale use at home or in schools following a Do It Yourself (DIY) approach, it transforms water bottles into plastic strips, which, after passing through an extruder nozzle, become filaments with a diameter of 1.75 mm. These can replace commercially available thermoplastic filaments. Specimens produced by additive manufacturing with recycled PET (rPET) and commercial PETG showed similar mechanical properties and can serve as alternatives to commercial PETG. PETG shows higher strength (30 MPa) compared to rPET (24 MPa), a slightly higher Young’s modulus of 1.44 GPa versus 1.43 GPa, and greater strain at failure with 0.03 mm/mm against 0.02 mm/mm, making it stiffer and more ductile. This simple and widely applicable local solution may absorb a considerable amount of bottle waste, offering an economical, sustainable alternative to commercial filaments.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/26PET recyclingenvironmental sustainabilitycircular economyadditive manufacturingfilament for 3D printersRPET
spellingShingle Pedro Pires
Martim Lima de Aguiar
André Costa Vieira
Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
PET recycling
environmental sustainability
circular economy
additive manufacturing
filament for 3D printers
RPET
title Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
title_full Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
title_fullStr Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
title_short Mechanical Performance of rPET Filament Obtained by Thermal Drawing for FFF Additive Manufacturing
title_sort mechanical performance of rpet filament obtained by thermal drawing for fff additive manufacturing
topic PET recycling
environmental sustainability
circular economy
additive manufacturing
filament for 3D printers
RPET
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/1/26
work_keys_str_mv AT pedropires mechanicalperformanceofrpetfilamentobtainedbythermaldrawingforfffadditivemanufacturing
AT martimlimadeaguiar mechanicalperformanceofrpetfilamentobtainedbythermaldrawingforfffadditivemanufacturing
AT andrecostavieira mechanicalperformanceofrpetfilamentobtainedbythermaldrawingforfffadditivemanufacturing