Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

Background. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) with significant involvement of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major cause of death and disability among the diabetic population. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-establi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Rola, Adrian Włodarczak, Mateusz Barycki, Marek Szudrowicz, Magdalena Łanocha, Jan Jakub Kulczycki, Karol Turkiewicz, Katarzyna Woźnica, Maciej Lesiak, Adrian Doroszko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8636050
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558471664369664
author Piotr Rola
Adrian Włodarczak
Mateusz Barycki
Marek Szudrowicz
Magdalena Łanocha
Jan Jakub Kulczycki
Karol Turkiewicz
Katarzyna Woźnica
Maciej Lesiak
Adrian Doroszko
author_facet Piotr Rola
Adrian Włodarczak
Mateusz Barycki
Marek Szudrowicz
Magdalena Łanocha
Jan Jakub Kulczycki
Karol Turkiewicz
Katarzyna Woźnica
Maciej Lesiak
Adrian Doroszko
author_sort Piotr Rola
collection DOAJ
description Background. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) with significant involvement of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major cause of death and disability among the diabetic population. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-established marker of poor clinical prognosis after PCI, which is mainly attributed to the rapid progression of atherosclerosis requiring recurrent revascularizations. Hence, the use of bioresorbable materials could provide some solution to this problem. Material and Methods. The study was divided into two arms. For the first one, we qualified 169 patients with NSTE-ACS treated with PCI who received the drug-eluting stent (DES) coated with a biodegradable polymer Ultimaster (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). The second arm was composed of 193 patients with ACS who underwent PCI with a magnesium bioresorbable scaffold Magmaris (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Both arms were divided into two subsequent groups: the T2DM (59 and 72) and the non-DM (110 and 121, respectively). The primary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and in-stent thrombosis. The main secondary outcomes included target lesion failure (TLF) and were recorded at a 1-year-follow-up. Results. There were no significant differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic populations in the primary endpoints or main secondary endpoints (TLF, scaffold restenosis, death from any reason, and other cardiovascular events) either in the Ultimaster or Magmaris group. At a 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint in the DM t.2 population was recorded in 2.7% Ultimaster vs. 5.1% Magmaris, respectively. Conclusion. Both, Ultimaster and Magmaris revealed relative safety and efficiency at a one-year follow-up in the diabetic population in ACS settings. The observed rates of TLF were low, which combined with a lack of in-stent thrombosis suggests that both investigated devices might be an interesting therapeutic option for diabetics with ACS. Nevertheless, further large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm fully our results.
format Article
id doaj-art-a477f207c7f6406facfd41e17210f966
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-a477f207c7f6406facfd41e17210f9662025-02-03T01:32:19ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67532021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8636050Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting StentsPiotr Rola0Adrian Włodarczak1Mateusz Barycki2Marek Szudrowicz3Magdalena Łanocha4Jan Jakub Kulczycki5Karol Turkiewicz6Katarzyna Woźnica7Maciej Lesiak8Adrian Doroszko9Department of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyAdalbert’s HospitalDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyFaculty of Mathematics and Information Science1st Department of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineBackground. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) with significant involvement of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major cause of death and disability among the diabetic population. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-established marker of poor clinical prognosis after PCI, which is mainly attributed to the rapid progression of atherosclerosis requiring recurrent revascularizations. Hence, the use of bioresorbable materials could provide some solution to this problem. Material and Methods. The study was divided into two arms. For the first one, we qualified 169 patients with NSTE-ACS treated with PCI who received the drug-eluting stent (DES) coated with a biodegradable polymer Ultimaster (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). The second arm was composed of 193 patients with ACS who underwent PCI with a magnesium bioresorbable scaffold Magmaris (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Both arms were divided into two subsequent groups: the T2DM (59 and 72) and the non-DM (110 and 121, respectively). The primary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and in-stent thrombosis. The main secondary outcomes included target lesion failure (TLF) and were recorded at a 1-year-follow-up. Results. There were no significant differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic populations in the primary endpoints or main secondary endpoints (TLF, scaffold restenosis, death from any reason, and other cardiovascular events) either in the Ultimaster or Magmaris group. At a 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint in the DM t.2 population was recorded in 2.7% Ultimaster vs. 5.1% Magmaris, respectively. Conclusion. Both, Ultimaster and Magmaris revealed relative safety and efficiency at a one-year follow-up in the diabetic population in ACS settings. The observed rates of TLF were low, which combined with a lack of in-stent thrombosis suggests that both investigated devices might be an interesting therapeutic option for diabetics with ACS. Nevertheless, further large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm fully our results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8636050
spellingShingle Piotr Rola
Adrian Włodarczak
Mateusz Barycki
Marek Szudrowicz
Magdalena Łanocha
Jan Jakub Kulczycki
Karol Turkiewicz
Katarzyna Woźnica
Maciej Lesiak
Adrian Doroszko
Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
Journal of Diabetes Research
title Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
title_full Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
title_fullStr Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
title_full_unstemmed Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
title_short Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
title_sort biodegradable polymer des ultimaster vs magnesium bioresorbable scaffold brs magmaris in diabetic population with nste acs a one year clinical outcome of two sirolimus eluting stents
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8636050
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrrola biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT adrianwłodarczak biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT mateuszbarycki biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT marekszudrowicz biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT magdalenałanocha biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT janjakubkulczycki biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT karolturkiewicz biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT katarzynawoznica biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT maciejlesiak biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents
AT adriandoroszko biodegradablepolymerdesultimastervsmagnesiumbioresorbablescaffoldbrsmagmarisindiabeticpopulationwithnsteacsaoneyearclinicaloutcomeoftwosirolimuselutingstents