One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America

Even though the term “ethnobotany” was created and characterized by John Harshberger in 1896, ethnobotanical investigations were conducted more than a quarter of a century earlier. The pivotal publication in the United States of America was issued anonymously in the 1870 Report of the Commissioner o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Bye, Edelmira Linares
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie 2021-12-01
Series:Revue d'ethnoécologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/8248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095908269916160
author Robert Bye
Edelmira Linares
author_facet Robert Bye
Edelmira Linares
author_sort Robert Bye
collection DOAJ
description Even though the term “ethnobotany” was created and characterized by John Harshberger in 1896, ethnobotanical investigations were conducted more than a quarter of a century earlier. The pivotal publication in the United States of America was issued anonymously in the 1870 Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture of the US government. It marked the shift from the cursory observations on plants used by “native” peoples to a systematic documentation and analysis of plant-people interactions and relationships over time and space; this transition coincided with the expansion of the USA into the western provinces of the North American continent. To attend to the author’s curiosity of plants with cultural significance that he encountered during his field experience with indigenous peoples as well as published literature, Dr. Edward Palmer (1831-1911) produced “Food Products of the North American Indians” for the 1870 report of the Department of Agriculture. This article was the first of 17 publications that he generated based upon his field work, botanical and ethnological specimens, laboratory analyses, and literature from the western provinces of the USA and northern Mexico. After 1892, his contributions were archived in his private files or shared with botanical and anthropological colleagues for their specialized publications. Our contribution provides updated scientific nomenclature of the 124 plants mentioned in his 1871 article as well as examples of Palmer´s ethnobotanical observations. A diachronic comparison between the food plants registered in 1871 and those listed in subsequent ethnobotanical studies suggest that 87% of the plants continued to be consumed into the 20th century.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4777c615a784cbaa73dafae2f447858
institution Kabale University
issn 2267-2419
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie
record_format Article
series Revue d'ethnoécologie
spelling doaj-art-a4777c615a784cbaa73dafae2f4478582025-02-05T16:25:08ZengLaboratoire Éco-anthropologie et EthnobiologieRevue d'ethnoécologie2267-24192021-12-012010.4000/ethnoecologie.8248One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North AmericaRobert ByeEdelmira LinaresEven though the term “ethnobotany” was created and characterized by John Harshberger in 1896, ethnobotanical investigations were conducted more than a quarter of a century earlier. The pivotal publication in the United States of America was issued anonymously in the 1870 Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture of the US government. It marked the shift from the cursory observations on plants used by “native” peoples to a systematic documentation and analysis of plant-people interactions and relationships over time and space; this transition coincided with the expansion of the USA into the western provinces of the North American continent. To attend to the author’s curiosity of plants with cultural significance that he encountered during his field experience with indigenous peoples as well as published literature, Dr. Edward Palmer (1831-1911) produced “Food Products of the North American Indians” for the 1870 report of the Department of Agriculture. This article was the first of 17 publications that he generated based upon his field work, botanical and ethnological specimens, laboratory analyses, and literature from the western provinces of the USA and northern Mexico. After 1892, his contributions were archived in his private files or shared with botanical and anthropological colleagues for their specialized publications. Our contribution provides updated scientific nomenclature of the 124 plants mentioned in his 1871 article as well as examples of Palmer´s ethnobotanical observations. A diachronic comparison between the food plants registered in 1871 and those listed in subsequent ethnobotanical studies suggest that 87% of the plants continued to be consumed into the 20th century.https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/8248ethnobotanyfood plantsNative American Indiansdiachronic analysiswestern United States
spellingShingle Robert Bye
Edelmira Linares
One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
Revue d'ethnoécologie
ethnobotany
food plants
Native American Indians
diachronic analysis
western United States
title One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
title_full One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
title_fullStr One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
title_full_unstemmed One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
title_short One hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in North America
title_sort one hundred and fifty years of ethnobotanical studies in north america
topic ethnobotany
food plants
Native American Indians
diachronic analysis
western United States
url https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/8248
work_keys_str_mv AT robertbye onehundredandfiftyyearsofethnobotanicalstudiesinnorthamerica
AT edelmiralinares onehundredandfiftyyearsofethnobotanicalstudiesinnorthamerica