Top Researchers May Suppress More Information Than They Provide: Surveying NBER Dismissive Literature Reviews
The authors read a systematic sample of “working papers” downloaded from the website of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) from the past quarter century—the years 2000 to 2024. They looked for “dismissive literature reviews” in the introductory and concluding sections of the papers. A d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Richard P Phelps, Cathryn MacArthur |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nonpartisan Education Group
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Nonpartisan Education Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v21n2.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The 100 top-cited studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: A bibliometric analysis
by: Liuliu Quan, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Literature Use in Iranian and International Journals of Applied Linguistics: A Grounded Theory Study
by: سیامک مرادی, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Duplicate references in the 'Introduction' and 'Discussion' sections of scientific articles on physical education and sports
by: Leonid Podrigalo, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Theoretical framework and methods for the analysis of the adoption-diffusion of innovations in agriculture: a bibliometric review
by: Rafael Mesa Manzano, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
DISMISSAL PROTECTION IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES IN LIGHT OF ILO CON VENTION No. 158
by: E. Sychenko, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)