Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study
This in vitro study evaluated the presence of voids in powder-liquid and capsulated glass ionomer cement. 40 cavities were prepared on root surfaces of maxillary incisors and divided into four groups. Cavities were conditioned with glass ionomer cement liquid (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in Group...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Biomaterials |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/935240 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832566976650674176 |
|---|---|
| author | Mamta Kaushik Roshni Sharma Pallavi Reddy Pallavi Pathak Pooja Udameshi Narmatha Vallakuruchi Jayabal |
| author_facet | Mamta Kaushik Roshni Sharma Pallavi Reddy Pallavi Pathak Pooja Udameshi Narmatha Vallakuruchi Jayabal |
| author_sort | Mamta Kaushik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This in vitro study evaluated the presence of voids in powder-liquid and capsulated glass ionomer cement. 40 cavities were prepared on root surfaces of maxillary incisors and divided into four groups. Cavities were conditioned with glass ionomer cement liquid (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in Groups 1 and 3 and with dentin conditioner (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in Groups 2 and 4. Conventional powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used as a restorative material in Groups 1 and 2. Capsulated glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used in Groups 3 and 4. Samples were sectioned and viewed under stereomicroscope to check for the presence of voids within the cement and at the cement-tooth junction. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests. Group 4 showed statistically significant results (P<0.05) when compared to Groups 1 and 2 for voids within the cement. However, for voids at the margins, the results were statistically insignificant. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a28e0d19afef4310be3d106763a93618 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8787 1687-8795 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Biomaterials |
| spelling | doaj-art-a28e0d19afef4310be3d106763a936182025-02-03T01:02:37ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87871687-87952014-01-01201410.1155/2014/935240935240Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro StudyMamta Kaushik0Roshni Sharma1Pallavi Reddy2Pallavi Pathak3Pooja Udameshi4Narmatha Vallakuruchi Jayabal5Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Chennapur, CRPF Road, Jai Jawahar Nagar Post, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500087, IndiaThis in vitro study evaluated the presence of voids in powder-liquid and capsulated glass ionomer cement. 40 cavities were prepared on root surfaces of maxillary incisors and divided into four groups. Cavities were conditioned with glass ionomer cement liquid (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in Groups 1 and 3 and with dentin conditioner (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in Groups 2 and 4. Conventional powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used as a restorative material in Groups 1 and 2. Capsulated glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used in Groups 3 and 4. Samples were sectioned and viewed under stereomicroscope to check for the presence of voids within the cement and at the cement-tooth junction. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests. Group 4 showed statistically significant results (P<0.05) when compared to Groups 1 and 2 for voids within the cement. However, for voids at the margins, the results were statistically insignificant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/935240 |
| spellingShingle | Mamta Kaushik Roshni Sharma Pallavi Reddy Pallavi Pathak Pooja Udameshi Narmatha Vallakuruchi Jayabal Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study International Journal of Biomaterials |
| title | Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study |
| title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Voids Present in Conventional and Capsulated Glass Ionomer Cements Using Two Different Conditioners: An In Vitro Study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of voids present in conventional and capsulated glass ionomer cements using two different conditioners an in vitro study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/935240 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mamtakaushik comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy AT roshnisharma comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy AT pallavireddy comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy AT pallavipathak comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy AT poojaudameshi comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy AT narmathavallakuruchijayabal comparativeevaluationofvoidspresentinconventionalandcapsulatedglassionomercementsusingtwodifferentconditionersaninvitrostudy |