Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits

We ask the question Which antibiotic deployment protocols select best against drug-resistant microbes: mixing or periodic cycling? and demonstrate that the statistical distribution of the performances of both sets of protocols, mixing and periodic cycling, must have overlapping supports. In other w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert E. Beardmore, Rafael Peña-Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2010-09-01
Series:Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2010.7.923
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590204127412224
author Robert E. Beardmore
Rafael Peña-Miller
author_facet Robert E. Beardmore
Rafael Peña-Miller
author_sort Robert E. Beardmore
collection DOAJ
description We ask the question Which antibiotic deployment protocols select best against drug-resistant microbes: mixing or periodic cycling? and demonstrate that the statistical distribution of the performances of both sets of protocols, mixing and periodic cycling, must have overlapping supports. In other words, it is a general, mathematical result that there must be mixing policies that outperform cycling policies and vice versa.   As a result, we agree with the tenet of Bonhoefer et al. [1] that one should not apply the results of [2] to conclude that an antibiotic cycling policy that implements cycles of drug restriction and prioritisation on an ad-hoc basis can select against drug-resistant microbial pathogens in a clinical setting any better than random drug use. However, nor should we conclude that a random, per-patient drug-assignment protocol is the de facto optimal method for allocating antibiotics to patients in any general sense.
format Article
id doaj-art-9ef16cfd7cdf4f37af2722d7d278b996
institution Kabale University
issn 1551-0018
language English
publishDate 2010-09-01
publisher AIMS Press
record_format Article
series Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-9ef16cfd7cdf4f37af2722d7d278b9962025-01-24T02:00:59ZengAIMS PressMathematical Biosciences and Engineering1551-00182010-09-017492393310.3934/mbe.2010.7.923Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative meritsRobert E. Beardmore0Rafael Peña-Miller1Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, LondonDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, LondonWe ask the question Which antibiotic deployment protocols select best against drug-resistant microbes: mixing or periodic cycling? and demonstrate that the statistical distribution of the performances of both sets of protocols, mixing and periodic cycling, must have overlapping supports. In other words, it is a general, mathematical result that there must be mixing policies that outperform cycling policies and vice versa.   As a result, we agree with the tenet of Bonhoefer et al. [1] that one should not apply the results of [2] to conclude that an antibiotic cycling policy that implements cycles of drug restriction and prioritisation on an ad-hoc basis can select against drug-resistant microbial pathogens in a clinical setting any better than random drug use. However, nor should we conclude that a random, per-patient drug-assignment protocol is the de facto optimal method for allocating antibiotics to patients in any general sense.https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2010.7.923antibiotic mixingepidemiologydrug resistance.antibiotic cycling
spellingShingle Robert E. Beardmore
Rafael Peña-Miller
Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
antibiotic mixing
epidemiology
drug resistance.
antibiotic cycling
title Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
title_full Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
title_fullStr Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
title_short Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
title_sort antibiotic cycling versus mixing the difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits
topic antibiotic mixing
epidemiology
drug resistance.
antibiotic cycling
url https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2010.7.923
work_keys_str_mv AT robertebeardmore antibioticcyclingversusmixingthedifficultyofusingmathematicalmodelstodefinitivelyquantifytheirrelativemerits
AT rafaelpenamiller antibioticcyclingversusmixingthedifficultyofusingmathematicalmodelstodefinitivelyquantifytheirrelativemerits