Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies

While conducting experiments via the Internet has become quite popular recently, there is still an ongoing debate regarding the reliability of data obtained using this method, especially for subtle manipulations and measurements susceptible to minor changes (e.g., reaction times). In this series of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrianna Wielgopolan, Maciej Pastwa, Dawid Żuk, Kamil K. Imbir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Language and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000772/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583859270582272
author Adrianna Wielgopolan
Maciej Pastwa
Dawid Żuk
Kamil K. Imbir
author_facet Adrianna Wielgopolan
Maciej Pastwa
Dawid Żuk
Kamil K. Imbir
author_sort Adrianna Wielgopolan
collection DOAJ
description While conducting experiments via the Internet has become quite popular recently, there is still an ongoing debate regarding the reliability of data obtained using this method, especially for subtle manipulations and measurements susceptible to minor changes (e.g., reaction times). In this series of two experiments employing the emotional Stroop task (using emotional word stimuli differing in their valence, arousal, and subjective significance levels), we compared the reaction times of participants taking part in experiments either in the laboratory (Experiment 1) or online (Experiment 2). In line with previous studies, there were no significant differences observed between the two experiments. Both modes of conducting studies yielded a similar pattern of results, namely interactions between valence and arousal, and a three-way interaction between valence, arousal, and subjective significance. We conclude that the pattern of disturbance in cognitive processing caused by affect is not susceptible to the setting that the subjects are in, which may be a significant argument for reliability of affect-related experiments conducted online.
format Article
id doaj-art-9eed9292fece4b1582b3a03424e81806
institution Kabale University
issn 1866-9808
1866-9859
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Language and Cognition
spelling doaj-art-9eed9292fece4b1582b3a03424e818062025-01-28T05:10:02ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592025-01-011710.1017/langcog.2024.77Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studiesAdrianna Wielgopolan0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1834-1941Maciej Pastwa1Dawid Żuk2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-2745Kamil K. Imbir3Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandWhile conducting experiments via the Internet has become quite popular recently, there is still an ongoing debate regarding the reliability of data obtained using this method, especially for subtle manipulations and measurements susceptible to minor changes (e.g., reaction times). In this series of two experiments employing the emotional Stroop task (using emotional word stimuli differing in their valence, arousal, and subjective significance levels), we compared the reaction times of participants taking part in experiments either in the laboratory (Experiment 1) or online (Experiment 2). In line with previous studies, there were no significant differences observed between the two experiments. Both modes of conducting studies yielded a similar pattern of results, namely interactions between valence and arousal, and a three-way interaction between valence, arousal, and subjective significance. We conclude that the pattern of disturbance in cognitive processing caused by affect is not susceptible to the setting that the subjects are in, which may be a significant argument for reliability of affect-related experiments conducted online.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000772/type/journal_articlearousalemotional wordsmotional Stroop taskonline experimentsvalence
spellingShingle Adrianna Wielgopolan
Maciej Pastwa
Dawid Żuk
Kamil K. Imbir
Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
Language and Cognition
arousal
emotional words
motional Stroop task
online experiments
valence
title Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
title_full Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
title_fullStr Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
title_short Emotional Stroop Test in online and offline experimental procedures: the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
title_sort emotional stroop test in online and offline experimental procedures the comparison of two different modes of conducting studies
topic arousal
emotional words
motional Stroop task
online experiments
valence
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000772/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT adriannawielgopolan emotionalstrooptestinonlineandofflineexperimentalproceduresthecomparisonoftwodifferentmodesofconductingstudies
AT maciejpastwa emotionalstrooptestinonlineandofflineexperimentalproceduresthecomparisonoftwodifferentmodesofconductingstudies
AT dawidzuk emotionalstrooptestinonlineandofflineexperimentalproceduresthecomparisonoftwodifferentmodesofconductingstudies
AT kamilkimbir emotionalstrooptestinonlineandofflineexperimentalproceduresthecomparisonoftwodifferentmodesofconductingstudies