Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations
Abstract Organizational leniency, defined as management’s systematic failure to address performance problems (such as low productivity, poor quality of work, absenteeism, etc.), is often a reality in public organizations. We posit that the negative consequences of organizational leniency may extend...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fundação Getúlio Vargas
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122024000600307&lng=en&tlng=en |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832592462545158144 |
---|---|
author | Gustavo M. Tavares Bradley E. Wright Filipe Sobral |
author_facet | Gustavo M. Tavares Bradley E. Wright Filipe Sobral |
author_sort | Gustavo M. Tavares |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Organizational leniency, defined as management’s systematic failure to address performance problems (such as low productivity, poor quality of work, absenteeism, etc.), is often a reality in public organizations. We posit that the negative consequences of organizational leniency may extend beyond the lost productivity of a few poor-performing employees. Specifically, we investigate the extent to which perceived organizational leniency may adversely affect the organizational climate and job satisfaction of public employees at large. We propose that the negative effect of organizational leniency is mediated by both perceived recognition received and employee-organization value congruence, forming a parallel mediation model. In other words, perceived organizational leniency may make public employees feel that their efforts are inadequately recognized and also diminishes how much they feel their values align with organizational practices. To test our hypotheses, we surveyed 256 government employees from various public organizations in Brazil. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with ordinary least squares and mediation tests. Consistent with our predictions, we found that perceived organizational leniency is negatively related to job satisfaction, with both perceived recognition and value congruence mediating this effect. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9ea196d9a3b2414aabc93080e3f80bcc |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0034-7612 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Fundação Getúlio Vargas |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista de Administração Pública |
spelling | doaj-art-9ea196d9a3b2414aabc93080e3f80bcc2025-01-21T07:43:55ZengFundação Getúlio VargasRevista de Administração Pública0034-76122025-01-0158610.1590/0034-761220240093xOrganizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizationsGustavo M. Tavareshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-9699Bradley E. WrightFilipe Sobralhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-9464Abstract Organizational leniency, defined as management’s systematic failure to address performance problems (such as low productivity, poor quality of work, absenteeism, etc.), is often a reality in public organizations. We posit that the negative consequences of organizational leniency may extend beyond the lost productivity of a few poor-performing employees. Specifically, we investigate the extent to which perceived organizational leniency may adversely affect the organizational climate and job satisfaction of public employees at large. We propose that the negative effect of organizational leniency is mediated by both perceived recognition received and employee-organization value congruence, forming a parallel mediation model. In other words, perceived organizational leniency may make public employees feel that their efforts are inadequately recognized and also diminishes how much they feel their values align with organizational practices. To test our hypotheses, we surveyed 256 government employees from various public organizations in Brazil. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with ordinary least squares and mediation tests. Consistent with our predictions, we found that perceived organizational leniency is negatively related to job satisfaction, with both perceived recognition and value congruence mediating this effect.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122024000600307&lng=en&tlng=enperformance managementjob satisfactionjob rewardsvalue congruenceinequity |
spellingShingle | Gustavo M. Tavares Bradley E. Wright Filipe Sobral Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations Revista de Administração Pública performance management job satisfaction job rewards value congruence inequity |
title | Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
title_full | Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
title_fullStr | Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
title_full_unstemmed | Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
title_short | Organizational leniency: examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
title_sort | organizational leniency examining the consequences of ignoring performance problems in public organizations |
topic | performance management job satisfaction job rewards value congruence inequity |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122024000600307&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gustavomtavares organizationalleniencyexaminingtheconsequencesofignoringperformanceproblemsinpublicorganizations AT bradleyewright organizationalleniencyexaminingtheconsequencesofignoringperformanceproblemsinpublicorganizations AT filipesobral organizationalleniencyexaminingtheconsequencesofignoringperformanceproblemsinpublicorganizations |