Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence

Objective. Variation in the position of the liver between preablation and postablation CT images hampers assessment of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that discordant preablation and postablation imaging is associated with more ablati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petra G. Kele, Eric J. Van der Jagt, Paul F. M. Krabbe, Koert P. de Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870306
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564555353423872
author Petra G. Kele
Eric J. Van der Jagt
Paul F. M. Krabbe
Koert P. de Jong
author_facet Petra G. Kele
Eric J. Van der Jagt
Paul F. M. Krabbe
Koert P. de Jong
author_sort Petra G. Kele
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Variation in the position of the liver between preablation and postablation CT images hampers assessment of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that discordant preablation and postablation imaging is associated with more ablation site recurrences (ASRs). Methods. Patients with CRLM were included. Index-tumor size, location, number, RFA approachs and ablative margins were obtained on CT scans. Preablation and postablation CT images were assigned a “Similarity of Positioning Score” (SiPS). A suitable cutoff was determined. Images were classified as identical (SiPS-id) or nonidentical (SiPS-diff). ASR was identified prospectively on follow-up imaging. Results. Forty-seven patients with 97 tumors underwent 64 RFA procedures (39 patients/63 tumors open RFA, 25 patients/34 tumours CT-targeted RFA, 12 patients underwent >1 RFA). Images of 52 (54%) ablation sites were classified as SiPS-id, 45 (46%) as SiPS-diff. Index-tumor size, tumor location and number, concomitant partial hepatectomy, and RFA approach did not influence the SiPS. ASR developed in 11/47 (23%) patients and 20/97 (21%) tumours. ASR occurred less frequently after open RFA than after CT targeted RFA (P<0.001). ASR was associated with larger index-tumour size (18.9 versus 12.8 mm, P=0.011). Cox proportional hazard model confirmed SiPS-diff, index-tumour size >20 mm and CT-targeted RFA as independent risk factors for ASR. Conclusion. Variation in anatomical concordance between preablation and postablation images, index-tumor size, and a CT-targeted approach are risk factors for ASR in CRLM.
format Article
id doaj-art-9e5420269003439097f7fffbca09fbe5
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3448
2090-3456
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-9e5420269003439097f7fffbca09fbe52025-02-03T01:10:47ZengWileyInternational Journal of Hepatology2090-34482090-34562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/870306870306Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site RecurrencePetra G. Kele0Eric J. Van der Jagt1Paul F. M. Krabbe2Koert P. de Jong3Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The NetherlandsHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsObjective. Variation in the position of the liver between preablation and postablation CT images hampers assessment of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that discordant preablation and postablation imaging is associated with more ablation site recurrences (ASRs). Methods. Patients with CRLM were included. Index-tumor size, location, number, RFA approachs and ablative margins were obtained on CT scans. Preablation and postablation CT images were assigned a “Similarity of Positioning Score” (SiPS). A suitable cutoff was determined. Images were classified as identical (SiPS-id) or nonidentical (SiPS-diff). ASR was identified prospectively on follow-up imaging. Results. Forty-seven patients with 97 tumors underwent 64 RFA procedures (39 patients/63 tumors open RFA, 25 patients/34 tumours CT-targeted RFA, 12 patients underwent >1 RFA). Images of 52 (54%) ablation sites were classified as SiPS-id, 45 (46%) as SiPS-diff. Index-tumor size, tumor location and number, concomitant partial hepatectomy, and RFA approach did not influence the SiPS. ASR developed in 11/47 (23%) patients and 20/97 (21%) tumours. ASR occurred less frequently after open RFA than after CT targeted RFA (P<0.001). ASR was associated with larger index-tumour size (18.9 versus 12.8 mm, P=0.011). Cox proportional hazard model confirmed SiPS-diff, index-tumour size >20 mm and CT-targeted RFA as independent risk factors for ASR. Conclusion. Variation in anatomical concordance between preablation and postablation images, index-tumor size, and a CT-targeted approach are risk factors for ASR in CRLM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870306
spellingShingle Petra G. Kele
Eric J. Van der Jagt
Paul F. M. Krabbe
Koert P. de Jong
Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
International Journal of Hepatology
title Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
title_full Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
title_fullStr Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
title_short Lack of Anatomical Concordance between Preablation and Postablation CT Images: A Risk Factor Related to Ablation Site Recurrence
title_sort lack of anatomical concordance between preablation and postablation ct images a risk factor related to ablation site recurrence
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870306
work_keys_str_mv AT petragkele lackofanatomicalconcordancebetweenpreablationandpostablationctimagesariskfactorrelatedtoablationsiterecurrence
AT ericjvanderjagt lackofanatomicalconcordancebetweenpreablationandpostablationctimagesariskfactorrelatedtoablationsiterecurrence
AT paulfmkrabbe lackofanatomicalconcordancebetweenpreablationandpostablationctimagesariskfactorrelatedtoablationsiterecurrence
AT koertpdejong lackofanatomicalconcordancebetweenpreablationandpostablationctimagesariskfactorrelatedtoablationsiterecurrence