Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
Objective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two co...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2010-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Analytical Chemistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832545387182817280 |
---|---|
author | Rochelle E. Tractenberg Jacqueline Jonklaas Steven J. Soldin |
author_facet | Rochelle E. Tractenberg Jacqueline Jonklaas Steven J. Soldin |
author_sort | Rochelle E. Tractenberg |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two cohorts of pregnant (n=57), and nonpregnant (n=28) women. Measurements. Samples were analyzed with both IA and MSMS. Results. Results for cortisol by the two methods tended to agree, but agreement weakened over the 60-minute test and was worse for higher (more extreme) concentrations. The results for FT4 depended on the method. IA measurements tended to agree with MSMS measurements when values fell within “normal levels”, but agreement was not constant across trimester in pregnant women and was poorest for the extreme (low/high) concentrations. Correlations between MSMS measurements and the difference between MSMS and IA results were strong and positive (0.411< r <0.823; all P<.05). Conclusions. IA and MSMS provide different measures of cortisol and FT4 at extreme levels, where clinical decision making requires the greatest precision. Agreement between the methods is inconsistent over time, is nonlinear, and varies with the analyte and concentrations. IA-based measurements may lead to erroneous clinical decisions. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9e45745529ec4e8f838a9da6516ddb38 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8760 1687-8779 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Analytical Chemistry |
spelling | doaj-art-9e45745529ec4e8f838a9da6516ddb382025-02-03T07:25:59ZengWileyInternational Journal of Analytical Chemistry1687-87601687-87792010-01-01201010.1155/2010/234808234808Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for CliniciansRochelle E. Tractenberg0Jacqueline Jonklaas1Steven J. Soldin2Departments of Neurology; Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics and Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USADivision of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USADivision of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USAObjective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two cohorts of pregnant (n=57), and nonpregnant (n=28) women. Measurements. Samples were analyzed with both IA and MSMS. Results. Results for cortisol by the two methods tended to agree, but agreement weakened over the 60-minute test and was worse for higher (more extreme) concentrations. The results for FT4 depended on the method. IA measurements tended to agree with MSMS measurements when values fell within “normal levels”, but agreement was not constant across trimester in pregnant women and was poorest for the extreme (low/high) concentrations. Correlations between MSMS measurements and the difference between MSMS and IA results were strong and positive (0.411< r <0.823; all P<.05). Conclusions. IA and MSMS provide different measures of cortisol and FT4 at extreme levels, where clinical decision making requires the greatest precision. Agreement between the methods is inconsistent over time, is nonlinear, and varies with the analyte and concentrations. IA-based measurements may lead to erroneous clinical decisions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808 |
spellingShingle | Rochelle E. Tractenberg Jacqueline Jonklaas Steven J. Soldin Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians International Journal of Analytical Chemistry |
title | Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians |
title_full | Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians |
title_fullStr | Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians |
title_short | Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians |
title_sort | agreement of immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry in the analysis of cortisol and free t4 interpretation and implications for clinicians |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rochelleetractenberg agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians AT jacquelinejonklaas agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians AT stevenjsoldin agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians |