Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians

Objective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rochelle E. Tractenberg, Jacqueline Jonklaas, Steven J. Soldin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545387182817280
author Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Jacqueline Jonklaas
Steven J. Soldin
author_facet Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Jacqueline Jonklaas
Steven J. Soldin
author_sort Rochelle E. Tractenberg
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two cohorts of pregnant (n=57), and nonpregnant (n=28) women. Measurements. Samples were analyzed with both IA and MSMS. Results. Results for cortisol by the two methods tended to agree, but agreement weakened over the 60-minute test and was worse for higher (more extreme) concentrations. The results for FT4 depended on the method. IA measurements tended to agree with MSMS measurements when values fell within “normal levels”, but agreement was not constant across trimester in pregnant women and was poorest for the extreme (low/high) concentrations. Correlations between MSMS measurements and the difference between MSMS and IA results were strong and positive (0.411<  r  <0.823; all P<.05). Conclusions. IA and MSMS provide different measures of cortisol and FT4 at extreme levels, where clinical decision making requires the greatest precision. Agreement between the methods is inconsistent over time, is nonlinear, and varies with the analyte and concentrations. IA-based measurements may lead to erroneous clinical decisions.
format Article
id doaj-art-9e45745529ec4e8f838a9da6516ddb38
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8760
1687-8779
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-9e45745529ec4e8f838a9da6516ddb382025-02-03T07:25:59ZengWileyInternational Journal of Analytical Chemistry1687-87601687-87792010-01-01201010.1155/2010/234808234808Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for CliniciansRochelle E. Tractenberg0Jacqueline Jonklaas1Steven J. Soldin2Departments of Neurology; Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics and Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USADivision of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USADivision of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USAObjective. To quantify differences in results obtained by immunoassays (IAs) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) for cortisol and free thyroxine (FT4). Design & Patients. Cortisol was measured over 60 minutes following a standard ACTH stimulation test (n=80); FT4 was measured over time in two cohorts of pregnant (n=57), and nonpregnant (n=28) women. Measurements. Samples were analyzed with both IA and MSMS. Results. Results for cortisol by the two methods tended to agree, but agreement weakened over the 60-minute test and was worse for higher (more extreme) concentrations. The results for FT4 depended on the method. IA measurements tended to agree with MSMS measurements when values fell within “normal levels”, but agreement was not constant across trimester in pregnant women and was poorest for the extreme (low/high) concentrations. Correlations between MSMS measurements and the difference between MSMS and IA results were strong and positive (0.411<  r  <0.823; all P<.05). Conclusions. IA and MSMS provide different measures of cortisol and FT4 at extreme levels, where clinical decision making requires the greatest precision. Agreement between the methods is inconsistent over time, is nonlinear, and varies with the analyte and concentrations. IA-based measurements may lead to erroneous clinical decisions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808
spellingShingle Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Jacqueline Jonklaas
Steven J. Soldin
Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
title Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
title_full Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
title_fullStr Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
title_short Agreement of Immunoassay and Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Cortisol and Free T4: Interpretation and Implications for Clinicians
title_sort agreement of immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry in the analysis of cortisol and free t4 interpretation and implications for clinicians
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/234808
work_keys_str_mv AT rochelleetractenberg agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians
AT jacquelinejonklaas agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians
AT stevenjsoldin agreementofimmunoassayandtandemmassspectrometryintheanalysisofcortisolandfreet4interpretationandimplicationsforclinicians