Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: All grants and manuscripts bearing the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group name are submitted for internal peer review before submission. The authors sought to formally evaluate authors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of this process.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Canadian Respiratory Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/595320 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832550437507563520 |
|---|---|
| author | Karen EA Burns Elaine Caon Peter M Dodek |
| author_facet | Karen EA Burns Elaine Caon Peter M Dodek |
| author_sort | Karen EA Burns |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: All grants and manuscripts bearing the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group name are submitted for internal peer review before submission. The authors sought to formally evaluate authors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of this process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9d2ff819e4644d1d9090a7b063ed13db |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1198-2241 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Canadian Respiratory Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-9d2ff819e4644d1d9090a7b063ed13db2025-02-03T06:06:51ZengWileyCanadian Respiratory Journal1198-22412014-01-0121528328610.1155/2014/595320Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials GroupKaren EA Burns0Elaine Caon1Peter M Dodek2St Michael’s Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaSt Michael’s Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaThe Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, CanadaRATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: All grants and manuscripts bearing the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group name are submitted for internal peer review before submission. The authors sought to formally evaluate authors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of this process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/595320 |
| spellingShingle | Karen EA Burns Elaine Caon Peter M Dodek Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Canadian Respiratory Journal |
| title | Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| title_full | Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| title_short | Evaluation of an Internal Review Process for Grants And Manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| title_sort | evaluation of an internal review process for grants and manuscripts in the canadian critical care trials group |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/595320 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kareneaburns evaluationofaninternalreviewprocessforgrantsandmanuscriptsinthecanadiancriticalcaretrialsgroup AT elainecaon evaluationofaninternalreviewprocessforgrantsandmanuscriptsinthecanadiancriticalcaretrialsgroup AT petermdodek evaluationofaninternalreviewprocessforgrantsandmanuscriptsinthecanadiancriticalcaretrialsgroup |