“So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy
This article examines the phenomenon of “cancel culture” through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic space. This approach allows us to go beyond traditional ethical and political frameworks, connecting cancel culture to the processes of building collective identity through social exclus...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ural Federal University
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Changing Societies & Personalities |
| Online Access: | https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/674 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832592298850910208 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniil A. Anikin Dina D. Ivanova |
| author_facet | Daniil A. Anikin Dina D. Ivanova |
| author_sort | Daniil A. Anikin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article examines the phenomenon of “cancel culture” through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic space. This approach allows us to go beyond traditional ethical and political frameworks, connecting
cancel culture to the processes of building collective identity through social exclusion and ostracism. In order to establish its boundaries, a community needs to define specific symbolic capital, which is reflected in both unifying symbols and the ways it distinguishes itself from others. This opposition is primarily expressed through negative symbols that help create a distinct identity. Cancel culture functions as a tool in the struggle for symbolic capital, leading to a restructuring of roles within the social landscape. This results in the emergence of four distinct groups: the “canceled,” the “cancelers–initiators,” the “cancelers–executors,” and the “authorities.” The interactions among these groups foster the development of new identities. It is concluded that in today’s public space, where virtualization accelerates the creation and dissemination of identifying symbols, various forms of identity are being formed. The process of canceling initiates a dual dynamic: it not only defines the identity of the canceling community but also encourages the communities of those canceled to fight for a positive redefinition of their own symbolic capital. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9afb95e0ea6742c19b88eb81ef10e775 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2587-6104 2587-8964 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Ural Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Changing Societies & Personalities |
| spelling | doaj-art-9afb95e0ea6742c19b88eb81ef10e7752025-01-21T11:33:55ZengUral Federal UniversityChanging Societies & Personalities2587-61042587-89642024-12-018484786010.15826/csp.2024.8.4.302674“So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic PolicyDaniil A. Anikin0Dina D. Ivanova1Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RussiaUral Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia; Saratov State University, Saratov, RussiaThis article examines the phenomenon of “cancel culture” through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic space. This approach allows us to go beyond traditional ethical and political frameworks, connecting cancel culture to the processes of building collective identity through social exclusion and ostracism. In order to establish its boundaries, a community needs to define specific symbolic capital, which is reflected in both unifying symbols and the ways it distinguishes itself from others. This opposition is primarily expressed through negative symbols that help create a distinct identity. Cancel culture functions as a tool in the struggle for symbolic capital, leading to a restructuring of roles within the social landscape. This results in the emergence of four distinct groups: the “canceled,” the “cancelers–initiators,” the “cancelers–executors,” and the “authorities.” The interactions among these groups foster the development of new identities. It is concluded that in today’s public space, where virtualization accelerates the creation and dissemination of identifying symbols, various forms of identity are being formed. The process of canceling initiates a dual dynamic: it not only defines the identity of the canceling community but also encourages the communities of those canceled to fight for a positive redefinition of their own symbolic capital.https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/674 |
| spellingShingle | Daniil A. Anikin Dina D. Ivanova “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy Changing Societies & Personalities |
| title | “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy |
| title_full | “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy |
| title_fullStr | “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy |
| title_short | “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy |
| title_sort | so the last will be first cancel culture as an instrument of symbolic policy |
| url | https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/674 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT daniilaanikin sothelastwillbefirstcancelcultureasaninstrumentofsymbolicpolicy AT dinadivanova sothelastwillbefirstcancelcultureasaninstrumentofsymbolicpolicy |