A Reply to Céspedes’ Defense of Causal Contrastivism

In a recent article in this journal, Esteban Céspedes (2015) seeks to defend the contrastive account of singular causation from my criticisms (Steglich-Petersen 2012). Céspedes objects to my argument on three counts: (1) it is circular in presupposing a principle that it seeks to establish; (2) tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) 2018-10-01
Series:Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/227
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!