Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy

(Hungarians as pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Traces of erudition in the late antique and early medieval periods in the work of Archdeacon Thomas of Split. Part 2. The Perception of the Massagetean. 2) The “Hunnic” context, 1. Huns and Hungarians): Thomas of Split is considered to be the first known...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lesław Spychała
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Instytut Historyczny, Uniwersytet Wrocławski 2024-12-01
Series:Studia Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi Incohantis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://samai.uni.wroc.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Leslaw-Spychala-Wegrzy-jako-pars-aliqua-SAMAI-9.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584081904238592
author Lesław Spychała
author_facet Lesław Spychała
author_sort Lesław Spychała
collection DOAJ
description (Hungarians as pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Traces of erudition in the late antique and early medieval periods in the work of Archdeacon Thomas of Split. Part 2. The Perception of the Massagetean. 2) The “Hunnic” context, 1. Huns and Hungarians): Thomas of Split is considered to be the first known author in the territories ruled by the Arpads who identified Hungarians with Huns (however, such an identification was known in Europe from the beginning of the 10th century). Earlier, in the first decades of the 13th century, Attila was added to the genealogy of the ruling dynasty, even though there were statements in that century that excluded Attila and promoted Saint Stephen. This duality in the perception of Attila needs to be explained primarily by the pragmatism of the circles gathered around the royal court. The accounts known from other sources that link the motifs of the city, sword, and treasure of Attila with Hungary, once considered arguments proving the early development of a Hun-Hungarian identity there, arose outside the area of that monarchy and there is no indication that, except for the first account, they were known there. There is no evidence that shows the Archdeacon of Split knew at least the last two. Also, proper names and toponyms that resemble in terms of pronunciation, or in terms of spelling the name of Attila, recorded in the period preceding the creation of HISTORIA in testimonies in western Europe have nothing in common with the name of the ruler of the Huns. The identity of Huns and Hungarians, together with the references to both Attila as the ferocissimus persecutor christianorum (that could be understand as a synonym for flagellum Dei) and Hungarian invasions, all of which are to be found in Thomas’ work, seem to reflect the accounts of many medieval sources. At the same time, echoes of the last two motifs also appear in Hartvik’s LEGEND OF KING STEPHEN, which was known to Thomas.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a6b23550c6f49b597d5dc2f5798376d
institution Kabale University
issn 2544-4379
language deu
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Instytut Historyczny, Uniwersytet Wrocławski
record_format Article
series Studia Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi Incohantis
spelling doaj-art-9a6b23550c6f49b597d5dc2f5798376d2025-01-27T18:47:37ZdeuInstytut Historyczny, Uniwersytet WrocławskiStudia Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi Incohantis2544-43792024-12-019 (2024)11017310.34616/samai.2024.9.110.173Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy Lesław Spychała0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-4497Uniwersytet Wrocławski(Hungarians as pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Traces of erudition in the late antique and early medieval periods in the work of Archdeacon Thomas of Split. Part 2. The Perception of the Massagetean. 2) The “Hunnic” context, 1. Huns and Hungarians): Thomas of Split is considered to be the first known author in the territories ruled by the Arpads who identified Hungarians with Huns (however, such an identification was known in Europe from the beginning of the 10th century). Earlier, in the first decades of the 13th century, Attila was added to the genealogy of the ruling dynasty, even though there were statements in that century that excluded Attila and promoted Saint Stephen. This duality in the perception of Attila needs to be explained primarily by the pragmatism of the circles gathered around the royal court. The accounts known from other sources that link the motifs of the city, sword, and treasure of Attila with Hungary, once considered arguments proving the early development of a Hun-Hungarian identity there, arose outside the area of that monarchy and there is no indication that, except for the first account, they were known there. There is no evidence that shows the Archdeacon of Split knew at least the last two. Also, proper names and toponyms that resemble in terms of pronunciation, or in terms of spelling the name of Attila, recorded in the period preceding the creation of HISTORIA in testimonies in western Europe have nothing in common with the name of the ruler of the Huns. The identity of Huns and Hungarians, together with the references to both Attila as the ferocissimus persecutor christianorum (that could be understand as a synonym for flagellum Dei) and Hungarian invasions, all of which are to be found in Thomas’ work, seem to reflect the accounts of many medieval sources. At the same time, echoes of the last two motifs also appear in Hartvik’s LEGEND OF KING STEPHEN, which was known to Thomas.https://samai.uni.wroc.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Leslaw-Spychala-Wegrzy-jako-pars-aliqua-SAMAI-9.pdfmassagetshunshungariansattilaarchdeacon thomas of splitorigo gentishistoriography of the middle agesmassagecihunowiewęgrzyattylatomasz archidiakon splituhistoriografia wieków średnich
spellingShingle Lesław Spychała
Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
Studia Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi Incohantis
massagets
huns
hungarians
attila
archdeacon thomas of split
origo gentis
historiography of the middle ages
massageci
hunowie
węgrzy
attyla
tomasz archidiakon splitu
historiografia wieków średnich
title Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
title_full Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
title_fullStr Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
title_full_unstemmed Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
title_short Węgrzy jako pars aliqua gentis Massagetum. Ślady późnoantycznej i wczesnośredniowiecznej uczoności w dziele Tomasza archidiakona Splitu. Część 2. Postrzeganie Massagetów. 2) Kontekst „huński”, 1. Hunowie-Węgrzy
title_sort wegrzy jako pars aliqua gentis massagetum slady poznoantycznej i wczesnosredniowiecznej uczonosci w dziele tomasza archidiakona splitu czesc 2 postrzeganie massagetow 2 kontekst hunski 1 hunowie wegrzy
topic massagets
huns
hungarians
attila
archdeacon thomas of split
origo gentis
historiography of the middle ages
massageci
hunowie
węgrzy
attyla
tomasz archidiakon splitu
historiografia wieków średnich
url https://samai.uni.wroc.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Leslaw-Spychala-Wegrzy-jako-pars-aliqua-SAMAI-9.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lesławspychała wegrzyjakoparsaliquagentismassagetumsladypoznoantycznejiwczesnosredniowiecznejuczonosciwdzieletomaszaarchidiakonasplituczesc2postrzeganiemassagetow2konteksthunski1hunowiewegrzy