Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war

In this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artem Zakharchenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589859336749056
author Artem Zakharchenko
Artem Zakharchenko
author_facet Artem Zakharchenko
Artem Zakharchenko
author_sort Artem Zakharchenko
collection DOAJ
description In this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “affective public” on social media—emotionally tied social media users, according to Papacharissi’s definition. We argue that the patriotic Ukrainian narrative about the war evolved in social media can be considered a connective strategic narrative that is more comprehensive than the “normal” strategic narrative shaped by authorities, while the pro-Russian social media war narrative is merely a reflection of the official strategic narrative. Based on social media data, we conducted a structural narrative analysis of both strategic narratives used in the ongoing war in Ukraine and deployed in the Ukrainian information space: the offensive pro-Russian narrative and the defensive Ukrainian narrative. The pattern for such analysis is based on Korostelina’s framework for national narrative analysis. Our analysis emphasizes the key differences between these narratives and shows that the Russian one has crucial disadvantages that prevent it from successfully engaging the Ukrainian people. Instead, as it was developed with the significant participation of ordinary citizens, the Ukrainian strategic narrative had the total advantage in the struggle for the attention of Ukrainians at the beginning of the full-scale invasion.
format Article
id doaj-art-99a89bea94f8458b86326cd1ce0afb9c
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-3145
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Political Science
spelling doaj-art-99a89bea94f8458b86326cd1ce0afb9c2025-01-24T07:13:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452025-01-01710.3389/fpos.2025.14342401434240Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian warArtem Zakharchenko0Artem Zakharchenko1Institute of Journalism, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UkraineNGO Communication Analysis Team – Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineIn this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “affective public” on social media—emotionally tied social media users, according to Papacharissi’s definition. We argue that the patriotic Ukrainian narrative about the war evolved in social media can be considered a connective strategic narrative that is more comprehensive than the “normal” strategic narrative shaped by authorities, while the pro-Russian social media war narrative is merely a reflection of the official strategic narrative. Based on social media data, we conducted a structural narrative analysis of both strategic narratives used in the ongoing war in Ukraine and deployed in the Ukrainian information space: the offensive pro-Russian narrative and the defensive Ukrainian narrative. The pattern for such analysis is based on Korostelina’s framework for national narrative analysis. Our analysis emphasizes the key differences between these narratives and shows that the Russian one has crucial disadvantages that prevent it from successfully engaging the Ukrainian people. Instead, as it was developed with the significant participation of ordinary citizens, the Ukrainian strategic narrative had the total advantage in the struggle for the attention of Ukrainians at the beginning of the full-scale invasion.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/fullstrategic narrativewar communicationsocial mediaaffective publicRussian-Ukrainian warpropaganda
spellingShingle Artem Zakharchenko
Artem Zakharchenko
Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
Frontiers in Political Science
strategic narrative
war communication
social media
affective public
Russian-Ukrainian war
propaganda
title Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
title_full Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
title_fullStr Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
title_short Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
title_sort advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the russian ukrainian war
topic strategic narrative
war communication
social media
affective public
Russian-Ukrainian war
propaganda
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/full
work_keys_str_mv AT artemzakharchenko advantagesoftheconnectivestrategicnarrativeduringtherussianukrainianwar
AT artemzakharchenko advantagesoftheconnectivestrategicnarrativeduringtherussianukrainianwar