Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
In this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Political Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832589859336749056 |
---|---|
author | Artem Zakharchenko Artem Zakharchenko |
author_facet | Artem Zakharchenko Artem Zakharchenko |
author_sort | Artem Zakharchenko |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “affective public” on social media—emotionally tied social media users, according to Papacharissi’s definition. We argue that the patriotic Ukrainian narrative about the war evolved in social media can be considered a connective strategic narrative that is more comprehensive than the “normal” strategic narrative shaped by authorities, while the pro-Russian social media war narrative is merely a reflection of the official strategic narrative. Based on social media data, we conducted a structural narrative analysis of both strategic narratives used in the ongoing war in Ukraine and deployed in the Ukrainian information space: the offensive pro-Russian narrative and the defensive Ukrainian narrative. The pattern for such analysis is based on Korostelina’s framework for national narrative analysis. Our analysis emphasizes the key differences between these narratives and shows that the Russian one has crucial disadvantages that prevent it from successfully engaging the Ukrainian people. Instead, as it was developed with the significant participation of ordinary citizens, the Ukrainian strategic narrative had the total advantage in the struggle for the attention of Ukrainians at the beginning of the full-scale invasion. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-99a89bea94f8458b86326cd1ce0afb9c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2673-3145 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Political Science |
spelling | doaj-art-99a89bea94f8458b86326cd1ce0afb9c2025-01-24T07:13:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452025-01-01710.3389/fpos.2025.14342401434240Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian warArtem Zakharchenko0Artem Zakharchenko1Institute of Journalism, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UkraineNGO Communication Analysis Team – Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineIn this article, we expand the methodological approach to strategic narrative analysis based on the case of the contemporary Russian–Ukrainian war. Namely, we introduce the concept of a “connective strategic narrative.” Such a narrative is not intentionally constructed by elites but created by the “affective public” on social media—emotionally tied social media users, according to Papacharissi’s definition. We argue that the patriotic Ukrainian narrative about the war evolved in social media can be considered a connective strategic narrative that is more comprehensive than the “normal” strategic narrative shaped by authorities, while the pro-Russian social media war narrative is merely a reflection of the official strategic narrative. Based on social media data, we conducted a structural narrative analysis of both strategic narratives used in the ongoing war in Ukraine and deployed in the Ukrainian information space: the offensive pro-Russian narrative and the defensive Ukrainian narrative. The pattern for such analysis is based on Korostelina’s framework for national narrative analysis. Our analysis emphasizes the key differences between these narratives and shows that the Russian one has crucial disadvantages that prevent it from successfully engaging the Ukrainian people. Instead, as it was developed with the significant participation of ordinary citizens, the Ukrainian strategic narrative had the total advantage in the struggle for the attention of Ukrainians at the beginning of the full-scale invasion.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/fullstrategic narrativewar communicationsocial mediaaffective publicRussian-Ukrainian warpropaganda |
spellingShingle | Artem Zakharchenko Artem Zakharchenko Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war Frontiers in Political Science strategic narrative war communication social media affective public Russian-Ukrainian war propaganda |
title | Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war |
title_full | Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war |
title_fullStr | Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war |
title_full_unstemmed | Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war |
title_short | Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war |
title_sort | advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the russian ukrainian war |
topic | strategic narrative war communication social media affective public Russian-Ukrainian war propaganda |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434240/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT artemzakharchenko advantagesoftheconnectivestrategicnarrativeduringtherussianukrainianwar AT artemzakharchenko advantagesoftheconnectivestrategicnarrativeduringtherussianukrainianwar |