Comparison of objectively measured and estimated cardiorespiratory fitness to predict all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies representing 35 cohorts and 3.8 million observations

Comparison of objectively measured and estimated cardiorespiratory fitness to predict all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies representing 35 cohorts and 3.8 million observations

Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a powerful health marker recommended by the American Heart Association as a clinical vital sign. Comparing the predictive validity of objectively measured CRF (the “gold standard”) and estimated CRF is clinically relevant because estimated CRF is more f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben Singh, Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez, Bruno G.G. da Costa, José Castro-Piñero, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Magdalena Cuenca-García, Carol Maher, Nuria Marín-Jiménez, Ryan McGrath, Pablo Molina-García, Jonathan Myers, Bethany Gower, Francisco B. Ortega, Justin J. Lang, Grant R. Tomkinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-12-01
Series:Journal of Sport and Health Science
Subjects:
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Cardiovascular diseases
Cohort studies
Risk assessment
Adult
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209525462400142X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209525462400142X

Similar Items