Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy

Objective. To analyze and compare decision-relevant knowledge, decisional conflict, and informed decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation between potential screening participants with low and adequate health literacy (HL), defined as the skills to access, understand, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. L. Essink-Bot, E. Dekker, D. R. M. Timmermans, E. Uiters, M. P. Fransen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7292369
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555871618465792
author M. L. Essink-Bot
E. Dekker
D. R. M. Timmermans
E. Uiters
M. P. Fransen
author_facet M. L. Essink-Bot
E. Dekker
D. R. M. Timmermans
E. Uiters
M. P. Fransen
author_sort M. L. Essink-Bot
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To analyze and compare decision-relevant knowledge, decisional conflict, and informed decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation between potential screening participants with low and adequate health literacy (HL), defined as the skills to access, understand, and apply information to make informed decisions about health. Methods. Survey including 71 individuals with low HL and 70 with adequate HL, all eligible for the Dutch organized CRC screening program. Knowledge, attitude, intention to participate, and decisional conflict were assessed after reading the standard information materials. HL was assessed using the Short Assessment of Health Literacy in Dutch. Informed decision-making was analyzed by the multidimensional measure of informed choice. Results. 64% of the study population had adequate knowledge of CRC and CRC screening (low HL 43/71 (61%), adequate HL 47/70 (67%), p>0.05). 57% were informed decision-makers (low HL 34/71 (55%), adequate HL 39/70 (58%), p>0.05). Intention to participate was 89% (low HL 63/71 (89%), adequate HL 63/70 (90%)). Respondents with low HL experienced significantly more decisional conflict (25.8 versus 16.1; p=0.00). Conclusion. Informed decision-making about CRC screening participation was suboptimal among both individuals with low HL and individuals with adequate HL. Further research is required to develop and implement effective strategies to convey decision-relevant knowledge about CRC screening to all screening invitees.
format Article
id doaj-art-955fa432dde940f18b0fe0a26f4c549f
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-955fa432dde940f18b0fe0a26f4c549f2025-02-03T05:46:56ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/72923697292369Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health LiteracyM. L. Essink-Bot0E. Dekker1D. R. M. Timmermans2E. Uiters3M. P. Fransen4Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, NetherlandsNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, NetherlandsDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, NetherlandsObjective. To analyze and compare decision-relevant knowledge, decisional conflict, and informed decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation between potential screening participants with low and adequate health literacy (HL), defined as the skills to access, understand, and apply information to make informed decisions about health. Methods. Survey including 71 individuals with low HL and 70 with adequate HL, all eligible for the Dutch organized CRC screening program. Knowledge, attitude, intention to participate, and decisional conflict were assessed after reading the standard information materials. HL was assessed using the Short Assessment of Health Literacy in Dutch. Informed decision-making was analyzed by the multidimensional measure of informed choice. Results. 64% of the study population had adequate knowledge of CRC and CRC screening (low HL 43/71 (61%), adequate HL 47/70 (67%), p>0.05). 57% were informed decision-makers (low HL 34/71 (55%), adequate HL 39/70 (58%), p>0.05). Intention to participate was 89% (low HL 63/71 (89%), adequate HL 63/70 (90%)). Respondents with low HL experienced significantly more decisional conflict (25.8 versus 16.1; p=0.00). Conclusion. Informed decision-making about CRC screening participation was suboptimal among both individuals with low HL and individuals with adequate HL. Further research is required to develop and implement effective strategies to convey decision-relevant knowledge about CRC screening to all screening invitees.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7292369
spellingShingle M. L. Essink-Bot
E. Dekker
D. R. M. Timmermans
E. Uiters
M. P. Fransen
Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
title_full Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
title_fullStr Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
title_short Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy
title_sort knowledge and informed decision making about population based colorectal cancer screening participation in groups with low and adequate health literacy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7292369
work_keys_str_mv AT mlessinkbot knowledgeandinformeddecisionmakingaboutpopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningparticipationingroupswithlowandadequatehealthliteracy
AT edekker knowledgeandinformeddecisionmakingaboutpopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningparticipationingroupswithlowandadequatehealthliteracy
AT drmtimmermans knowledgeandinformeddecisionmakingaboutpopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningparticipationingroupswithlowandadequatehealthliteracy
AT euiters knowledgeandinformeddecisionmakingaboutpopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningparticipationingroupswithlowandadequatehealthliteracy
AT mpfransen knowledgeandinformeddecisionmakingaboutpopulationbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningparticipationingroupswithlowandadequatehealthliteracy