Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations

Abstract Background Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masato Kikuta, Sei Naito, Takahiro Osawa, Kazuyuki Numakura, Takafumi Narisawa, Yuki Takai, Mayu Yagi, Yuya Sekine, Ojiro Tokairin, Nobuo Shinohara, Tomonori Habuchi, Norihiko Tsuchiya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13504-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585651456835584
author Masato Kikuta
Sei Naito
Takahiro Osawa
Kazuyuki Numakura
Takafumi Narisawa
Yuki Takai
Mayu Yagi
Yuya Sekine
Ojiro Tokairin
Nobuo Shinohara
Tomonori Habuchi
Norihiko Tsuchiya
author_facet Masato Kikuta
Sei Naito
Takahiro Osawa
Kazuyuki Numakura
Takafumi Narisawa
Yuki Takai
Mayu Yagi
Yuya Sekine
Ojiro Tokairin
Nobuo Shinohara
Tomonori Habuchi
Norihiko Tsuchiya
author_sort Masato Kikuta
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting outcomes for patients treated with either immune-oncologic drug doublet (IO-IO) or immune-oncologic drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations (IO-TKI). A secondary objective to compare the effectiveness of IO-IO versus IO-TKI within the IMDC risk groups over a short follow-up period. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure 2 (TTF2), and overall survival (OS) were compared between IMDC risk categories. Model fit was assessed using the c-index. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust and compare outcomes between IO-IO and IO-TKI, except for IMDC favorable risk patients due to the small number of IO-IO cases. Results The IMDC risk model demonstrated a c-index of 0.684 (OS) for entire cohort, 0.600 (PFS), 0.596 (TTF2), and 0.624 (OS) for IO-IO, and 0.667 (PFS), 0.702 (TTF2), and 0.751 (OS) for IO-TKI. In the IMDC intermediate and poor risk groups after IPTW adjustment, PFS (HR 0.72), TTF2 (HR 0.67), and OS (HR 0.74) did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI. Specifically, in the IMDC intermediate risk group, PFS (HR 0.79), TTF2 (HR 0.69), and OS (HR 0.65) were longer in IO-TKI, though the differences were not statistically significant. In the IMDC poor risk group, PFS (HR 0.76), TTF2 (HR 0.77), and OS (HR 1.03) were comparable. Conclusions The impact of IMDC risk model on survival was modest in IO-IO, while remained statistically substantial in IO-TKI. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI during the short follow-up period.
format Article
id doaj-art-93e83d9a23c9462f89ca3d5c3755fa7d
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2407
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj-art-93e83d9a23c9462f89ca3d5c3755fa7d2025-01-26T12:37:52ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072025-01-0125111210.1186/s12885-025-13504-6Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinationsMasato Kikuta0Sei Naito1Takahiro Osawa2Kazuyuki Numakura3Takafumi Narisawa4Yuki Takai5Mayu Yagi6Yuya Sekine7Ojiro Tokairin8Nobuo Shinohara9Tomonori Habuchi10Norihiko Tsuchiya11Department of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido UniversityDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido UniversityDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido UniversityDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University School of MedicineAbstract Background Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting outcomes for patients treated with either immune-oncologic drug doublet (IO-IO) or immune-oncologic drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations (IO-TKI). A secondary objective to compare the effectiveness of IO-IO versus IO-TKI within the IMDC risk groups over a short follow-up period. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure 2 (TTF2), and overall survival (OS) were compared between IMDC risk categories. Model fit was assessed using the c-index. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust and compare outcomes between IO-IO and IO-TKI, except for IMDC favorable risk patients due to the small number of IO-IO cases. Results The IMDC risk model demonstrated a c-index of 0.684 (OS) for entire cohort, 0.600 (PFS), 0.596 (TTF2), and 0.624 (OS) for IO-IO, and 0.667 (PFS), 0.702 (TTF2), and 0.751 (OS) for IO-TKI. In the IMDC intermediate and poor risk groups after IPTW adjustment, PFS (HR 0.72), TTF2 (HR 0.67), and OS (HR 0.74) did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI. Specifically, in the IMDC intermediate risk group, PFS (HR 0.79), TTF2 (HR 0.69), and OS (HR 0.65) were longer in IO-TKI, though the differences were not statistically significant. In the IMDC poor risk group, PFS (HR 0.76), TTF2 (HR 0.77), and OS (HR 1.03) were comparable. Conclusions The impact of IMDC risk model on survival was modest in IO-IO, while remained statistically substantial in IO-TKI. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI during the short follow-up period.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13504-6ComparisonImmunotherapyImmune-combinationsPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
spellingShingle Masato Kikuta
Sei Naito
Takahiro Osawa
Kazuyuki Numakura
Takafumi Narisawa
Yuki Takai
Mayu Yagi
Yuya Sekine
Ojiro Tokairin
Nobuo Shinohara
Tomonori Habuchi
Norihiko Tsuchiya
Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
BMC Cancer
Comparison
Immunotherapy
Immune-combinations
Prognosis
Renal cell carcinoma; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
title Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
title_full Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
title_fullStr Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
title_full_unstemmed Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
title_short Real-world short-term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune combinations
title_sort real world short term outcomes and treatment regimen comparisons in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first line immune combinations
topic Comparison
Immunotherapy
Immune-combinations
Prognosis
Renal cell carcinoma; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13504-6
work_keys_str_mv AT masatokikuta realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT seinaito realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT takahiroosawa realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT kazuyukinumakura realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT takafuminarisawa realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT yukitakai realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT mayuyagi realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT yuyasekine realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT ojirotokairin realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT nobuoshinohara realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT tomonorihabuchi realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations
AT norihikotsuchiya realworldshorttermoutcomesandtreatmentregimencomparisonsinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomatreatedwithfirstlineimmunecombinations