Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer

Abstract Background KRAS mutations in rectal cancer are associated with a conflict prognosis. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological outcomes of patients and tumor criteria between wKRAS and mKRAS, as well as overall survival in the two groups. Methods The research retrospectively analyzed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shengbin Zheng, Zhijie You, Guodon Guo, Zhijing Lin, Siming Wang, Guohua Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03615-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571669721382912
author Shengbin Zheng
Zhijie You
Guodon Guo
Zhijing Lin
Siming Wang
Guohua Yang
author_facet Shengbin Zheng
Zhijie You
Guodon Guo
Zhijing Lin
Siming Wang
Guohua Yang
author_sort Shengbin Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background KRAS mutations in rectal cancer are associated with a conflict prognosis. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological outcomes of patients and tumor criteria between wKRAS and mKRAS, as well as overall survival in the two groups. Methods The research retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 193 patients who received surgical treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma between May 2015 and December 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their KRAS status: wild-type KRAS (wKRAS) and mutant KRAS (mKRAS), with performing research on mKRAS G12D and mKRAS G13D mutation. Results The mKRAS group included 100 patients(51.8%) and had no significantly difference in age, sex, distance from anus, tumor node metastasis(TNM), lymphovascular invasion(LVI), grade differentiation, and perineural invasion(PNI), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) level than that in wKRAS group.KRASG12D group had significantly more poorer differentiation(9/34,26.5% vs. 10/93,10.7%,p = 0.046), PNI(24/34,70.6%vs.42/93,45.2%,p = 0.016) and higher TD(8/34,23.5% vs.8/93,8.6%,p = 0.035) respectively, p < 0.05. Compared with the wKRAS group, the mean OS of mKRAS group was worse(58.07 m vs.57.55 m), but had no significant difference(p = 0.0866). In comparison to the wKRAS group, the overall survival duration was notably reduced in the KRASG12D group (p = 0.0482), whereas no significant difference was observed in the KRASG13D group (p = 0.1848). Additionally, a COX survival analysis was conducted, revealing that KRASG12D, along with higher TNM stage, LVI, tumor deposits, and PNI, were all associated with a decrease in survival time for patients with rectal cancer; however, these factors did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion The overall survival duration for wKRAS was superior to that of mKRAS; however, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. In contrast, the survival time for KRASG12D was significantly poorer than that for wKRAS, while no such difference was observed for KRASG13D. Retrospectively registered K2024-07-037.2024,7.
format Article
id doaj-art-9340af8f512f45a6b9645c6399ca5b9b
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-230X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-9340af8f512f45a6b9645c6399ca5b9b2025-02-02T12:27:18ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2025-01-012511710.1186/s12876-025-03615-6Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancerShengbin Zheng0Zhijie You1Guodon Guo2Zhijing Lin3Siming Wang4Guohua Yang5Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical College FuZhou FuJiangAbstract Background KRAS mutations in rectal cancer are associated with a conflict prognosis. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological outcomes of patients and tumor criteria between wKRAS and mKRAS, as well as overall survival in the two groups. Methods The research retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 193 patients who received surgical treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma between May 2015 and December 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their KRAS status: wild-type KRAS (wKRAS) and mutant KRAS (mKRAS), with performing research on mKRAS G12D and mKRAS G13D mutation. Results The mKRAS group included 100 patients(51.8%) and had no significantly difference in age, sex, distance from anus, tumor node metastasis(TNM), lymphovascular invasion(LVI), grade differentiation, and perineural invasion(PNI), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) level than that in wKRAS group.KRASG12D group had significantly more poorer differentiation(9/34,26.5% vs. 10/93,10.7%,p = 0.046), PNI(24/34,70.6%vs.42/93,45.2%,p = 0.016) and higher TD(8/34,23.5% vs.8/93,8.6%,p = 0.035) respectively, p < 0.05. Compared with the wKRAS group, the mean OS of mKRAS group was worse(58.07 m vs.57.55 m), but had no significant difference(p = 0.0866). In comparison to the wKRAS group, the overall survival duration was notably reduced in the KRASG12D group (p = 0.0482), whereas no significant difference was observed in the KRASG13D group (p = 0.1848). Additionally, a COX survival analysis was conducted, revealing that KRASG12D, along with higher TNM stage, LVI, tumor deposits, and PNI, were all associated with a decrease in survival time for patients with rectal cancer; however, these factors did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion The overall survival duration for wKRAS was superior to that of mKRAS; however, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. In contrast, the survival time for KRASG12D was significantly poorer than that for wKRAS, while no such difference was observed for KRASG13D. Retrospectively registered K2024-07-037.2024,7.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03615-6Rectal cancerKRAS mutationOverall survival Clinicopathological outcomesPrognosis
spellingShingle Shengbin Zheng
Zhijie You
Guodon Guo
Zhijing Lin
Siming Wang
Guohua Yang
Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
BMC Gastroenterology
Rectal cancer
KRAS mutation
Overall survival Clinicopathological outcomes
Prognosis
title Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_full Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_fullStr Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_short Effect of KRAS mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_sort effect of kras mutation status on clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer
topic Rectal cancer
KRAS mutation
Overall survival Clinicopathological outcomes
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03615-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shengbinzheng effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT zhijieyou effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT guodonguo effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT zhijinglin effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT simingwang effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT guohuayang effectofkrasmutationstatusonclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithrectalcancer