Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up

Objective. Maxillary anterior spacing is a common aesthetic complaint of patients. Midline diastema has a multifactorial etiology such as labial frenulum, microdontia, mesiodens, peg-shaped lateral incisors, agenesis, cysts, habits such as finger sucking, tongue thrusting, or lip sucking, dental mal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bora Korkut, Funda Yanikoglu, Dilek Tagtekin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6810984
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560747343773696
author Bora Korkut
Funda Yanikoglu
Dilek Tagtekin
author_facet Bora Korkut
Funda Yanikoglu
Dilek Tagtekin
author_sort Bora Korkut
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Maxillary anterior spacing is a common aesthetic complaint of patients. Midline diastema has a multifactorial etiology such as labial frenulum, microdontia, mesiodens, peg-shaped lateral incisors, agenesis, cysts, habits such as finger sucking, tongue thrusting, or lip sucking, dental malformations, genetics, proclinations, dental-skeletal discrepancies, and imperfect coalescence of interdental septum. Appropriate technique and material for effective treatment are based on time, physical, psychological, and economical limitations. Direct composite resins in diastema cases allow dentist and patient complete control of these limitations and formation of natural smile. Clinical Considerations. In this case report a maxillary midline diastema was closed with direct composite resin restorations in one appointment without any preparation. One bottle total etch adhesive was used and translucent/opaque composite resin shades were layered on mesial surfaces of the teeth that were isolated with rubber dam and Teflon bands. Finishing and polishing procedures were achieved by using polishing discs. Patient was informed for recalls for every 6 months. Conclusions. At one-year recall no sensitivities, discolorations, or fractures were detected on teeth and restorations. Direct composite resins seemed to be highly aesthetic and durable restorations that can satisfy patients as under the conditions of case presented.
format Article
id doaj-art-92b47c1feaae4180ad4d9f1f18efd2a0
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6447
2090-6455
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-92b47c1feaae4180ad4d9f1f18efd2a02025-02-03T01:26:44ZengWileyCase Reports in Dentistry2090-64472090-64552016-01-01201610.1155/2016/68109846810984Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-UpBora Korkut0Funda Yanikoglu1Dilek Tagtekin2Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34746 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34746 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34746 Istanbul, TurkeyObjective. Maxillary anterior spacing is a common aesthetic complaint of patients. Midline diastema has a multifactorial etiology such as labial frenulum, microdontia, mesiodens, peg-shaped lateral incisors, agenesis, cysts, habits such as finger sucking, tongue thrusting, or lip sucking, dental malformations, genetics, proclinations, dental-skeletal discrepancies, and imperfect coalescence of interdental septum. Appropriate technique and material for effective treatment are based on time, physical, psychological, and economical limitations. Direct composite resins in diastema cases allow dentist and patient complete control of these limitations and formation of natural smile. Clinical Considerations. In this case report a maxillary midline diastema was closed with direct composite resin restorations in one appointment without any preparation. One bottle total etch adhesive was used and translucent/opaque composite resin shades were layered on mesial surfaces of the teeth that were isolated with rubber dam and Teflon bands. Finishing and polishing procedures were achieved by using polishing discs. Patient was informed for recalls for every 6 months. Conclusions. At one-year recall no sensitivities, discolorations, or fractures were detected on teeth and restorations. Direct composite resins seemed to be highly aesthetic and durable restorations that can satisfy patients as under the conditions of case presented.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6810984
spellingShingle Bora Korkut
Funda Yanikoglu
Dilek Tagtekin
Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
Case Reports in Dentistry
title Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
title_full Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
title_short Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up
title_sort direct midline diastema closure with composite layering technique a one year follow up
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6810984
work_keys_str_mv AT borakorkut directmidlinediastemaclosurewithcompositelayeringtechniqueaoneyearfollowup
AT fundayanikoglu directmidlinediastemaclosurewithcompositelayeringtechniqueaoneyearfollowup
AT dilektagtekin directmidlinediastemaclosurewithcompositelayeringtechniqueaoneyearfollowup