Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto
Measuring impact has traditionally been the weakest step in the traditional evaluation of aid, because of its costs, methodologies, time and difficulties in attributing effects. But this exercise is necessary both in technical and moral terms, especially for those benefitting from the aid. The use...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía Global
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/163/79 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832544278198353920 |
---|---|
author | Vázquez-De Francisco, María José Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes Caldentey-Del Pozo, Pedro |
author_facet | Vázquez-De Francisco, María José Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes Caldentey-Del Pozo, Pedro |
author_sort | Vázquez-De Francisco, María José |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Measuring impact has traditionally been the weakest step in the traditional evaluation of aid, because of its costs, methodologies, time and difficulties in attributing effects. But this exercise is necessary both in technical and moral terms, especially for those benefitting from the aid.
The use of a logical framework as the most accepted tool for aid management has not helped in impact measuring, which is a revealing reflection of aid effectiveness. It is precisely those international commitments for aid effectiveness that highlight the limitations of traditional evaluation practices.
This paper intends to reflect upon those limits through a systematic academic review, and will propose a conceptual revision of impact evaluation indicators. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-914bd9ca2b07471a8dac0b8d55a70777 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2254-2035 2254-2035 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-11-01 |
publisher | Universidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía Global |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo |
spelling | doaj-art-914bd9ca2b07471a8dac0b8d55a707772025-02-03T10:45:11ZengUniversidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía GlobalRevista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo2254-20352254-20352015-11-014280105Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impactoVázquez-De Francisco, María José0Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes1Caldentey-Del Pozo, Pedro2Universidad Loyola AndalucíaUniversidad Loyola AndalucíaUniversidad Loyola AndalucíaMeasuring impact has traditionally been the weakest step in the traditional evaluation of aid, because of its costs, methodologies, time and difficulties in attributing effects. But this exercise is necessary both in technical and moral terms, especially for those benefitting from the aid. The use of a logical framework as the most accepted tool for aid management has not helped in impact measuring, which is a revealing reflection of aid effectiveness. It is precisely those international commitments for aid effectiveness that highlight the limitations of traditional evaluation practices. This paper intends to reflect upon those limits through a systematic academic review, and will propose a conceptual revision of impact evaluation indicators.http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/163/79cooperationimpacteffectivenessevaluation |
spellingShingle | Vázquez-De Francisco, María José Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes Caldentey-Del Pozo, Pedro Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo cooperation impact effectiveness evaluation |
title | Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto |
title_full | Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto |
title_fullStr | Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto |
title_full_unstemmed | Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto |
title_short | Límites del marco lógico y deficiencias de la evaluación tradicional de la cooperación al desarrollo para medir impacto |
title_sort | limites del marco logico y deficiencias de la evaluacion tradicional de la cooperacion al desarrollo para medir impacto |
topic | cooperation impact effectiveness evaluation |
url | http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/163/79 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezdefranciscomariajose limitesdelmarcologicoydeficienciasdelaevaluaciontradicionaldelacooperacionaldesarrolloparamedirimpacto AT torresjimenezmercedes limitesdelmarcologicoydeficienciasdelaevaluaciontradicionaldelacooperacionaldesarrolloparamedirimpacto AT caldenteydelpozopedro limitesdelmarcologicoydeficienciasdelaevaluaciontradicionaldelacooperacionaldesarrolloparamedirimpacto |