Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology

Owing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu Liu, Lingxian Xu, Junyue Wang, Huang Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563229113450496
author Lu Liu
Lingxian Xu
Junyue Wang
Huang Wu
author_facet Lu Liu
Lingxian Xu
Junyue Wang
Huang Wu
author_sort Lu Liu
collection DOAJ
description Owing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement system was established using two 4 K smartphones and a phoropter to evaluate the effects of luminance and contrast variations on the stereoacuity test. Seventeen young subjects with normal visual acuity and stereopsis were recruited. Two types of test symbols, contour-based and random-dot-based, were used in the experiment. Four series tests were established with different maximum brightness values, including 240 lux, 120 lux, 60 lux, and 30 lux. Each series test contained 19 pages with different contrasts between 95% and 5% and was calculated using the Michelson contrast formula. No significant difference was found for both contour-based and random-dot-based stereograms in any of the contrast groups with different maximum brightness. Similarly, no significant difference was found between contour-based and random-dot-based patterns under different contrasts of above 35%. As the contrast decreased below 30%, the stereopsis was significantly better in the contour-based pattern than in the random-dot-based pattern for some degrees of contrast. The luminance and contrast of the digital display are not critical factors for stereoacuity under normal circumstances. This implies that a standard monitor with a certain 3D technology can be used to measure the stereoacuity threshold without calibrating the luminance and contrast.
format Article
id doaj-art-8dd0c2a239eb46b69c6dbc69b6e0db97
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-8dd0c2a239eb46b69c6dbc69b6e0db972025-02-03T01:20:38ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5258782Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone TechnologyLu Liu0Lingxian Xu1Junyue Wang2Huang Wu3Department of OptometryDepartment of OptometryHospital of StomatologyDepartment of OptometryOwing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement system was established using two 4 K smartphones and a phoropter to evaluate the effects of luminance and contrast variations on the stereoacuity test. Seventeen young subjects with normal visual acuity and stereopsis were recruited. Two types of test symbols, contour-based and random-dot-based, were used in the experiment. Four series tests were established with different maximum brightness values, including 240 lux, 120 lux, 60 lux, and 30 lux. Each series test contained 19 pages with different contrasts between 95% and 5% and was calculated using the Michelson contrast formula. No significant difference was found for both contour-based and random-dot-based stereograms in any of the contrast groups with different maximum brightness. Similarly, no significant difference was found between contour-based and random-dot-based patterns under different contrasts of above 35%. As the contrast decreased below 30%, the stereopsis was significantly better in the contour-based pattern than in the random-dot-based pattern for some degrees of contrast. The luminance and contrast of the digital display are not critical factors for stereoacuity under normal circumstances. This implies that a standard monitor with a certain 3D technology can be used to measure the stereoacuity threshold without calibrating the luminance and contrast.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782
spellingShingle Lu Liu
Lingxian Xu
Junyue Wang
Huang Wu
Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_full Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_fullStr Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_short Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_sort effect of luminance and contrast variation on stereoacuity measurements using smartphone technology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782
work_keys_str_mv AT luliu effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT lingxianxu effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT junyuewang effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT huangwu effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology