A law of meaning

This article rejects the canonical ideal of a one-to-one correspondence between meaning and marker and proposes a set-theoretical and optimality-based law for the relationship between meaning and its markers which allows for distinguishing true markers (such as not, no, never for negation) from othe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernhard Wälchli, Anna Sjöberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2025-01-01
Series:Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Subjects:
Online Access:https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18920
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576139637293056
author Bernhard Wälchli
Anna Sjöberg
author_facet Bernhard Wälchli
Anna Sjöberg
author_sort Bernhard Wälchli
collection DOAJ
description This article rejects the canonical ideal of a one-to-one correspondence between meaning and marker and proposes a set-theoretical and optimality-based law for the relationship between meaning and its markers which allows for distinguishing true markers (such as not, no, never for negation) from otherwise associated items (such as negative polarity items as but, any): a meaning is expressed by the set of non-randomly recurrent markers that together are the best collocation of that meaning. We implement the law in an algorithm using Dunning’s log-likelihood and illustrate it by extracting markers for ‘know’, negation, first person subject and complementizers from translations of the New Testament in a variety sample of 83 languages with manual evaluation of all extracted markers. Markers are extracted from unannotated texts (with lexemes being just a special case of marker-set coalition phenomena) considering just one meaning at a time (without any need for accounting for specific coexpression types).
format Article
id doaj-art-8c8a2c8ced8e4905b597d28acf1fe66b
institution Kabale University
issn 2785-0943
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher University of Bologna
record_format Article
series Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
spelling doaj-art-8c8a2c8ced8e4905b597d28acf1fe66b2025-01-31T10:34:03ZengUniversity of BolognaLinguistic Typology at the Crossroads2785-09432025-01-014217110.6092/issn.2785-0943/1892017282A law of meaningBernhard Wälchli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-6855Anna Sjöberg1https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4344-196XStockholm University, Department of linguisticsStockholm University, Department of linguisticsThis article rejects the canonical ideal of a one-to-one correspondence between meaning and marker and proposes a set-theoretical and optimality-based law for the relationship between meaning and its markers which allows for distinguishing true markers (such as not, no, never for negation) from otherwise associated items (such as negative polarity items as but, any): a meaning is expressed by the set of non-randomly recurrent markers that together are the best collocation of that meaning. We implement the law in an algorithm using Dunning’s log-likelihood and illustrate it by extracting markers for ‘know’, negation, first person subject and complementizers from translations of the New Testament in a variety sample of 83 languages with manual evaluation of all extracted markers. Markers are extracted from unannotated texts (with lexemes being just a special case of marker-set coalition phenomena) considering just one meaning at a time (without any need for accounting for specific coexpression types).https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18920semanticsparallel textscollocationoptimalitynegationpersonal pronounscomplementizersknowledge predication
spellingShingle Bernhard Wälchli
Anna Sjöberg
A law of meaning
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
semantics
parallel texts
collocation
optimality
negation
personal pronouns
complementizers
knowledge predication
title A law of meaning
title_full A law of meaning
title_fullStr A law of meaning
title_full_unstemmed A law of meaning
title_short A law of meaning
title_sort law of meaning
topic semantics
parallel texts
collocation
optimality
negation
personal pronouns
complementizers
knowledge predication
url https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18920
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardwalchli alawofmeaning
AT annasjoberg alawofmeaning
AT bernhardwalchli lawofmeaning
AT annasjoberg lawofmeaning