A new portable sampler of atmospheric methane for radiocarbon measurements

<p>Radiocarbon (<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C) is an optimal tracer of methane emissions, as <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C measurements enable distinguishing between fossil methane and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Zazzeri, L. Wacker, N. Haghipour, P. Gautschi, T. Laemmel, S. Szidat, H. Graven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/319/2025/amt-18-319-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<p>Radiocarbon (<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C) is an optimal tracer of methane emissions, as <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C measurements enable distinguishing between fossil methane and biogenic methane (CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>). However, <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C measurements in atmospheric methane are still rare, mainly because of the technical challenge of collecting enough carbon for <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>C analysis from ambient air samples. In this study, we address this challenge by advancing the system in Zazzeri et al. (2021) into a much more compact and portable sampler and by coupling the sampler with the MICADAS (MIni CArbon DAting System) accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) system at ETH Zurich, using a gas interface.</p> <p>Here, we present the new sampler setup, the assessment of the system contamination and a first inter-laboratory comparison with LARA (Laboratory for the Analysis of Radiocarbon with AMS) at the University of Bern.</p> <p>With our sampling line, we achieved a very low blank, 0.7 <span class="inline-formula">µgC</span> compared to 5.5 <span class="inline-formula">µgC</span> in Zazzeri et al. (2021), and a sample precision of 0.9 %, comparable with other measurement techniques for <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>, while reducing the sample size to 60 L of air. We show that this technique, with further improvements, will enable routine <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup></span>CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> measurements in the field for an improved understanding of CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> sources.</p>
ISSN:1867-1381
1867-8548