Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and polyethylene stents (PES) are both commonly used in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Although SEMS are significantly more expensive, they are more efficacious than PES. Accordingly, a cost-effectiveness a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan N Barkun, Viviane Adam, Myriam Martel, Khalid AlNaamani, Peter L Moses
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743417
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550290461556736
author Alan N Barkun
Viviane Adam
Myriam Martel
Khalid AlNaamani
Peter L Moses
author_facet Alan N Barkun
Viviane Adam
Myriam Martel
Khalid AlNaamani
Peter L Moses
author_sort Alan N Barkun
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and polyethylene stents (PES) are both commonly used in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Although SEMS are significantly more expensive, they are more efficacious than PES. Accordingly, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed.
format Article
id doaj-art-87ae554b27df4c26a3d1a0dc8fba077a
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-2789
2291-2797
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-87ae554b27df4c26a3d1a0dc8fba077a2025-02-03T06:07:10ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27892291-27972015-01-0129737738310.1155/2015/743417Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisAlan N Barkun0Viviane Adam1Myriam Martel2Khalid AlNaamani3Peter L Moses4Division of Gastroenterology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, The Armed Forces Hospital, Muscat, OmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USABACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and polyethylene stents (PES) are both commonly used in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Although SEMS are significantly more expensive, they are more efficacious than PES. Accordingly, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743417
spellingShingle Alan N Barkun
Viviane Adam
Myriam Martel
Khalid AlNaamani
Peter L Moses
Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents versus Polyethylene Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort partially covered self expandable metal stents versus polyethylene stents for malignant biliary obstruction a cost effectiveness analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743417
work_keys_str_mv AT alannbarkun partiallycoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsversuspolyethylenestentsformalignantbiliaryobstructionacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT vivianeadam partiallycoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsversuspolyethylenestentsformalignantbiliaryobstructionacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT myriammartel partiallycoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsversuspolyethylenestentsformalignantbiliaryobstructionacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT khalidalnaamani partiallycoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsversuspolyethylenestentsformalignantbiliaryobstructionacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT peterlmoses partiallycoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsversuspolyethylenestentsformalignantbiliaryobstructionacosteffectivenessanalysis