Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian

This paper presents the findings of two experiments on pied-piping by a prenominal adjunct in Hungarian focus- and wh-constructions. According to Webelhuth (1992) and Cable (2010), pied-piping from adjunct islands is prohibited. The results of the experiments, however, suggest that not only is it p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Júlia Keresztes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2020-12-01
Series:LingBaW
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/11834
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592726918430720
author Júlia Keresztes
author_facet Júlia Keresztes
author_sort Júlia Keresztes
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents the findings of two experiments on pied-piping by a prenominal adjunct in Hungarian focus- and wh-constructions. According to Webelhuth (1992) and Cable (2010), pied-piping from adjunct islands is prohibited. The results of the experiments, however, suggest that not only is it possible in Hungarian for the pied-piper to be embedded inside an adjunct island but the embedding of the pied-piper and the movement itself are unrestricted in focus-construction. Pied-piping shows a similar picture in wh-constructions with the restriction that the wh-element has to be discourse-linked for pied-piping to be allowed.
format Article
id doaj-art-879c21884d734dd2b1de66a164892ac9
institution Kabale University
issn 2450-5188
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series LingBaW
spelling doaj-art-879c21884d734dd2b1de66a164892ac92025-01-21T05:13:49ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLingBaW2450-51882020-12-016110.31743/lingbaw.11834Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in HungarianJúlia Keresztes0University of Debrecen This paper presents the findings of two experiments on pied-piping by a prenominal adjunct in Hungarian focus- and wh-constructions. According to Webelhuth (1992) and Cable (2010), pied-piping from adjunct islands is prohibited. The results of the experiments, however, suggest that not only is it possible in Hungarian for the pied-piper to be embedded inside an adjunct island but the embedding of the pied-piper and the movement itself are unrestricted in focus-construction. Pied-piping shows a similar picture in wh-constructions with the restriction that the wh-element has to be discourse-linked for pied-piping to be allowed. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/11834pied-pipingadjunct-islandsfocus-featurewh-featureHungarian
spellingShingle Júlia Keresztes
Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
LingBaW
pied-piping
adjunct-islands
focus-feature
wh-feature
Hungarian
title Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
title_full Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
title_fullStr Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
title_full_unstemmed Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
title_short Focus-feature and wh-feature in the light of pied piping behavior in Hungarian
title_sort focus feature and wh feature in the light of pied piping behavior in hungarian
topic pied-piping
adjunct-islands
focus-feature
wh-feature
Hungarian
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/11834
work_keys_str_mv AT juliakeresztes focusfeatureandwhfeatureinthelightofpiedpipingbehaviorinhungarian