What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel

Background. In a country immersed in endless rounds of wars, retained metallic foreign bodies remain a significant dilemma in the daily practice of every Lebanese radiologist. When a shrapnel’s hazard is of concern, the decision between performing or refusing a justified MRI exam is not always strai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Kanj, Ibrahim Ghosn, Assaad Mohanna, Georges Rouhana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6672617
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555188836106240
author Ali Kanj
Ibrahim Ghosn
Assaad Mohanna
Georges Rouhana
author_facet Ali Kanj
Ibrahim Ghosn
Assaad Mohanna
Georges Rouhana
author_sort Ali Kanj
collection DOAJ
description Background. In a country immersed in endless rounds of wars, retained metallic foreign bodies remain a significant dilemma in the daily practice of every Lebanese radiologist. When a shrapnel’s hazard is of concern, the decision between performing or refusing a justified MRI exam is not always straightforward. In this small trial, we aimed to better understand the shrapnel’s MRI safety by mimicking our daily practice. Methods. Five shrapnel with an incremental increase in their long axis were put in an animal flesh and then introduced into a 3 T magnetic field. The behavior of each shrapnel was concretely assessed by performing before and after magnetic field exposure CT acquisitions. Results. Translation along the z-axis ranged from 0.9 mm to 2.8 mm. Torque angle ranged between 2.8 and 54 degrees with an average of 15.62 degrees. Conclusions. Shrapnel’s movements in the magnetic field are not negligible during the acute phase of injury where there is no reinforcing fibroblastic reaction and invite us to reconsider the MRI safety of these metallic foreign bodies. Standard radiographs may be sufficient, but a targeted CT scan may be of better value for a confident decision for assessment of shrapnel position near viscera and major vessels.
format Article
id doaj-art-879976a887424d79a9292493f37b3a05
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1941
2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-879976a887424d79a9292493f37b3a052025-02-03T05:49:26ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66726176672617What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic ShrapnelAli Kanj0Ibrahim Ghosn1Assaad Mohanna2Georges Rouhana3Radiology Department, Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center, Saida, LebanonFellow of Radiology, Radiology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, LebanonRadiology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, LebanonRadiology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, LebanonBackground. In a country immersed in endless rounds of wars, retained metallic foreign bodies remain a significant dilemma in the daily practice of every Lebanese radiologist. When a shrapnel’s hazard is of concern, the decision between performing or refusing a justified MRI exam is not always straightforward. In this small trial, we aimed to better understand the shrapnel’s MRI safety by mimicking our daily practice. Methods. Five shrapnel with an incremental increase in their long axis were put in an animal flesh and then introduced into a 3 T magnetic field. The behavior of each shrapnel was concretely assessed by performing before and after magnetic field exposure CT acquisitions. Results. Translation along the z-axis ranged from 0.9 mm to 2.8 mm. Torque angle ranged between 2.8 and 54 degrees with an average of 15.62 degrees. Conclusions. Shrapnel’s movements in the magnetic field are not negligible during the acute phase of injury where there is no reinforcing fibroblastic reaction and invite us to reconsider the MRI safety of these metallic foreign bodies. Standard radiographs may be sufficient, but a targeted CT scan may be of better value for a confident decision for assessment of shrapnel position near viscera and major vessels.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6672617
spellingShingle Ali Kanj
Ibrahim Ghosn
Assaad Mohanna
Georges Rouhana
What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
Radiology Research and Practice
title What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
title_full What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
title_fullStr What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
title_full_unstemmed What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
title_short What Radiologist Should Know about MRI Translational Forces and Hazard: An Ex-Vivo Simulation of Retained Metallic Shrapnel
title_sort what radiologist should know about mri translational forces and hazard an ex vivo simulation of retained metallic shrapnel
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6672617
work_keys_str_mv AT alikanj whatradiologistshouldknowaboutmritranslationalforcesandhazardanexvivosimulationofretainedmetallicshrapnel
AT ibrahimghosn whatradiologistshouldknowaboutmritranslationalforcesandhazardanexvivosimulationofretainedmetallicshrapnel
AT assaadmohanna whatradiologistshouldknowaboutmritranslationalforcesandhazardanexvivosimulationofretainedmetallicshrapnel
AT georgesrouhana whatradiologistshouldknowaboutmritranslationalforcesandhazardanexvivosimulationofretainedmetallicshrapnel