Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts

BackgroundExplore methods to accurately reflect the risk level of ferrous metal foundry workplaces when the silica dust concentration exceeds the limit, and provide a basis for the application of risk assessment techniques in key industries with occupational exposure to silica dust.MethodsThe survey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qimeng Li, Xiaoying Li, Ge Qin, Yuanmeng Qi, Jie Liu, Xiaocui Tang, Di Wu, Changfu Hao, Sihua Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1465284/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087145137831936
author Qimeng Li
Xiaoying Li
Ge Qin
Yuanmeng Qi
Jie Liu
Xiaocui Tang
Di Wu
Changfu Hao
Sihua Wang
author_facet Qimeng Li
Xiaoying Li
Ge Qin
Yuanmeng Qi
Jie Liu
Xiaocui Tang
Di Wu
Changfu Hao
Sihua Wang
author_sort Qimeng Li
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundExplore methods to accurately reflect the risk level of ferrous metal foundry workplaces when the silica dust concentration exceeds the limit, and provide a basis for the application of risk assessment techniques in key industries with occupational exposure to silica dust.MethodsThe survey was conducted in 25 ferrous metal casting industries in Henan Province, China. Five occupational health risk assessment (OHRA) methods, including Risk index method, Hazard grading method, International Council on Mining and Metals model, The synthesis index method, and The exposure ratio method, were used to assess the occupational health risk of the workplaces that produced silica dust and the concentration of silica dust exceeded the occupational exposure limits (OELs), and to compare the results of the different methods.ResultsThe risk index assessment method yielded one job of mild hazard, seven job of moderate hazard, fifteen jobs of high hazard, and forty-four jobs of extreme hazard. The hazard classification method resulted in two jobs of mild hazard, six jobs of moderate hazard, and fifty-nine jobs of high hazard. The ICMM qualitative method identified fifteen jobs of moderate risk and fifty-two jobs of high risk. The synthesis index method revealed nine jobs of moderate risk and fifty-eight jobs of high risk. The exposure ratio method identified ten jobs of high risk and fifty-seven jobs of extremely high risk. The results obtained from the synthesis index method showed relatively lower levels, except for the index method, there was a certain correlation (r: 0.541–0.798, P < 0.05) and consistency (kapa: 0.521–0.561, P < 0.05) with the remaining four methods.ConclusionThis study shows that although there are some differences in the results of different OHRA methods, there is also some correlation between them, which can corroborate each other and enhance the reliability of the assessment results. In practical application, appropriate assessment methods should be selected according to specific situations and the results of multiple methods should be combined and analyzed comprehensively to ensure accurate identification and assessment of occupational hazards and provide a scientific basis for improving occupational safety and health management.
format Article
id doaj-art-87859736453d4bbea41f42337f4cfea2
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-87859736453d4bbea41f42337f4cfea22025-02-06T07:09:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652025-02-011310.3389/fpubh.2025.14652841465284Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit postsQimeng Li0Xiaoying Li1Ge Qin2Yuanmeng Qi3Jie Liu4Xiaocui Tang5Di Wu6Changfu Hao7Sihua Wang8Department of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, The Third People's Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Hospital for Occupational Diseases), Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, The Third People's Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Hospital for Occupational Diseases), Zhengzhou, ChinaBackgroundExplore methods to accurately reflect the risk level of ferrous metal foundry workplaces when the silica dust concentration exceeds the limit, and provide a basis for the application of risk assessment techniques in key industries with occupational exposure to silica dust.MethodsThe survey was conducted in 25 ferrous metal casting industries in Henan Province, China. Five occupational health risk assessment (OHRA) methods, including Risk index method, Hazard grading method, International Council on Mining and Metals model, The synthesis index method, and The exposure ratio method, were used to assess the occupational health risk of the workplaces that produced silica dust and the concentration of silica dust exceeded the occupational exposure limits (OELs), and to compare the results of the different methods.ResultsThe risk index assessment method yielded one job of mild hazard, seven job of moderate hazard, fifteen jobs of high hazard, and forty-four jobs of extreme hazard. The hazard classification method resulted in two jobs of mild hazard, six jobs of moderate hazard, and fifty-nine jobs of high hazard. The ICMM qualitative method identified fifteen jobs of moderate risk and fifty-two jobs of high risk. The synthesis index method revealed nine jobs of moderate risk and fifty-eight jobs of high risk. The exposure ratio method identified ten jobs of high risk and fifty-seven jobs of extremely high risk. The results obtained from the synthesis index method showed relatively lower levels, except for the index method, there was a certain correlation (r: 0.541–0.798, P < 0.05) and consistency (kapa: 0.521–0.561, P < 0.05) with the remaining four methods.ConclusionThis study shows that although there are some differences in the results of different OHRA methods, there is also some correlation between them, which can corroborate each other and enhance the reliability of the assessment results. In practical application, appropriate assessment methods should be selected according to specific situations and the results of multiple methods should be combined and analyzed comprehensively to ensure accurate identification and assessment of occupational hazards and provide a scientific basis for improving occupational safety and health management.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1465284/fullsilica dust exposurerisk assessmentoccupational healthferrous metal manufacturingoccupational exposure riskferrous foundries
spellingShingle Qimeng Li
Xiaoying Li
Ge Qin
Yuanmeng Qi
Jie Liu
Xiaocui Tang
Di Wu
Changfu Hao
Sihua Wang
Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
Frontiers in Public Health
silica dust exposure
risk assessment
occupational health
ferrous metal manufacturing
occupational exposure risk
ferrous foundries
title Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
title_full Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
title_fullStr Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
title_full_unstemmed Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
title_short Application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
title_sort application and comparison of five risk assessment methods in ferrous metal foundry enterprises with silica dust concentration exceeding the limit posts
topic silica dust exposure
risk assessment
occupational health
ferrous metal manufacturing
occupational exposure risk
ferrous foundries
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1465284/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qimengli applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT xiaoyingli applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT geqin applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT yuanmengqi applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT jieliu applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT xiaocuitang applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT diwu applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT changfuhao applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts
AT sihuawang applicationandcomparisonoffiveriskassessmentmethodsinferrousmetalfoundryenterpriseswithsilicadustconcentrationexceedingthelimitposts