Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data

Abstract Fedratinib is a predominantly JAK2 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in untreated and ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Based on randomized clinical trial data, it is approved for use in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or Dynamic Internationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrian Duek, Ilona Leviatan, Osnat Jarchowsky Dolberg, Martin H. Ellis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2025-01-01
Series:Blood Cancer Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01211-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594983492780032
author Adrian Duek
Ilona Leviatan
Osnat Jarchowsky Dolberg
Martin H. Ellis
author_facet Adrian Duek
Ilona Leviatan
Osnat Jarchowsky Dolberg
Martin H. Ellis
author_sort Adrian Duek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Fedratinib is a predominantly JAK2 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in untreated and ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Based on randomized clinical trial data, it is approved for use in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or high-risk disease and is distinguished from ruxolitinib in that it can be administered without dose reduction in patients with thrombocytopenia, to a platelet count above 50,000/µL. In these trials, fedratinib achieved significant spleen volume reduction in ~30–45% of patients and improvement in total symptom scores in 35–40% with good tolerability. In contrast, recently published real-world data suggest that these responses may not be as robust outside clinical trials. In the context of routine clinical practice spleen responses are documented in only 13–68%, with varying degrees of symptom improvement. This may be due to the lack of a uniform definition of ruxolitinib failure, which may influence the timing of initiating fedratinib as a second-line treatment and result in a more prolonged exposure to ruxolitinib prior to intitaing fedratinib treatment. We suggest that given the growing number of drugs available for use in MF, recognizing the failure of first-line (and potentially subsequent) treatments is critical to allow timely transition to potentially more active agents, as highlighted by the data pertaining to fedratinib.
format Article
id doaj-art-866276a14d65400a83fa09199d80272b
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-5385
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Blood Cancer Journal
spelling doaj-art-866276a14d65400a83fa09199d80272b2025-01-19T12:11:00ZengNature Publishing GroupBlood Cancer Journal2044-53852025-01-011511710.1038/s41408-025-01211-1Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” dataAdrian Duek0Ilona Leviatan1Osnat Jarchowsky Dolberg2Martin H. Ellis3Hematology Unit, University Hospital Samson AssutaDepartment of Medicine A, Meir Medical CenterDepartment of Medicine A, Meir Medical CenterSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv UniversityAbstract Fedratinib is a predominantly JAK2 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in untreated and ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Based on randomized clinical trial data, it is approved for use in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or high-risk disease and is distinguished from ruxolitinib in that it can be administered without dose reduction in patients with thrombocytopenia, to a platelet count above 50,000/µL. In these trials, fedratinib achieved significant spleen volume reduction in ~30–45% of patients and improvement in total symptom scores in 35–40% with good tolerability. In contrast, recently published real-world data suggest that these responses may not be as robust outside clinical trials. In the context of routine clinical practice spleen responses are documented in only 13–68%, with varying degrees of symptom improvement. This may be due to the lack of a uniform definition of ruxolitinib failure, which may influence the timing of initiating fedratinib as a second-line treatment and result in a more prolonged exposure to ruxolitinib prior to intitaing fedratinib treatment. We suggest that given the growing number of drugs available for use in MF, recognizing the failure of first-line (and potentially subsequent) treatments is critical to allow timely transition to potentially more active agents, as highlighted by the data pertaining to fedratinib.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01211-1
spellingShingle Adrian Duek
Ilona Leviatan
Osnat Jarchowsky Dolberg
Martin H. Ellis
Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
Blood Cancer Journal
title Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
title_full Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
title_fullStr Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
title_full_unstemmed Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
title_short Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and “real-world” data
title_sort fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis a critical appraisal of clinical trial and real world data
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01211-1
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianduek fedratinibforthetreatmentofmyelofibrosisacriticalappraisalofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT ilonaleviatan fedratinibforthetreatmentofmyelofibrosisacriticalappraisalofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT osnatjarchowskydolberg fedratinibforthetreatmentofmyelofibrosisacriticalappraisalofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT martinhellis fedratinibforthetreatmentofmyelofibrosisacriticalappraisalofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata