Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais
This paper focuses on the morphological process of libfixation (term coined by Arnold Zwicky). Libfixes are units which have been "liberated" from a source word in order to be used with new bases. Examples are -athon in zumbathon, -licious in bookilicious, -(a)holic in workaholic or -zilla...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Anglophonia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4891 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579247678423040 |
|---|---|
| author | Caroline Marty |
| author_facet | Caroline Marty |
| author_sort | Caroline Marty |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper focuses on the morphological process of libfixation (term coined by Arnold Zwicky). Libfixes are units which have been "liberated" from a source word in order to be used with new bases. Examples are -athon in zumbathon, -licious in bookilicious, -(a)holic in workaholic or -zilla in bridezilla. The extraction of a libfix brings about a morphological reanalysis of the source word, known as recutting. This reanalysis leads to a change in semantic status: as part of the source word, the libfix cannot be considered as a morpheme, but it can be labeled as such after its extraction. It is given a specific meaning and can be used in transparent compositions. For example, the sequence -zilla is not associated with any specific meaning in Godzilla (the denomination is opaque), but it becomes a full-fledged morpheme meaning ‘unpleasing, controlling’ in the schema [noun + -zilla], then perceived as more transparent (bridezilla meaning ‘a controlling bride’). The semantic and syntactic properties of libfixes are studied by comparing forty-nine units that are considered libfixes in the literature (e.g. -gate, -maggedon, -tainment, or those quoted earlier). The data is extracted from the English Web Corpus 2015 (Sketch Engine), the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). The productivity of the schemas yielded by libfixes is also considered. I will show that libfixation is a morphological process that generates very productive schemas based on recutting and semantic secretion. From a diachronic perspective, the libfix is first used by speakers to coin new ad hoc expressions, and it then becomes entrenched as a full-fledged construction capable of yielding a series of types. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-852aff2702a84b2d9c57af3c1922b84a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglophonia |
| spelling | doaj-art-852aff2702a84b2d9c57af3c1922b84a2025-01-30T12:33:08ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662022-07-013310.4000/anglophonia.4891Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglaisCaroline MartyThis paper focuses on the morphological process of libfixation (term coined by Arnold Zwicky). Libfixes are units which have been "liberated" from a source word in order to be used with new bases. Examples are -athon in zumbathon, -licious in bookilicious, -(a)holic in workaholic or -zilla in bridezilla. The extraction of a libfix brings about a morphological reanalysis of the source word, known as recutting. This reanalysis leads to a change in semantic status: as part of the source word, the libfix cannot be considered as a morpheme, but it can be labeled as such after its extraction. It is given a specific meaning and can be used in transparent compositions. For example, the sequence -zilla is not associated with any specific meaning in Godzilla (the denomination is opaque), but it becomes a full-fledged morpheme meaning ‘unpleasing, controlling’ in the schema [noun + -zilla], then perceived as more transparent (bridezilla meaning ‘a controlling bride’). The semantic and syntactic properties of libfixes are studied by comparing forty-nine units that are considered libfixes in the literature (e.g. -gate, -maggedon, -tainment, or those quoted earlier). The data is extracted from the English Web Corpus 2015 (Sketch Engine), the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). The productivity of the schemas yielded by libfixes is also considered. I will show that libfixation is a morphological process that generates very productive schemas based on recutting and semantic secretion. From a diachronic perspective, the libfix is first used by speakers to coin new ad hoc expressions, and it then becomes entrenched as a full-fledged construction capable of yielding a series of types.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4891analogyproductivitymorphologylibfixcreativity |
| spellingShingle | Caroline Marty Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais Anglophonia analogy productivity morphology libfix creativity |
| title | Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais |
| title_full | Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais |
| title_fullStr | Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais |
| title_full_unstemmed | Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais |
| title_short | Caractérisation et délimitation de la catégorie des libfixes en anglais |
| title_sort | caracterisation et delimitation de la categorie des libfixes en anglais |
| topic | analogy productivity morphology libfix creativity |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4891 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinemarty caracterisationetdelimitationdelacategoriedeslibfixesenanglais |