Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits

In this paper, we report a detailed analysis of the impaired performance of a dysgraphic individual, AD, who produced similar rates of letter-level errors in written spelling, oral spelling, and typing. We found that the distribution of various letter error types displayed a distinct pattern in writ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie-Pierre de Partz, Aliette Lochy, Agnesa Pillon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/741623
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561572866686976
author Marie-Pierre de Partz
Aliette Lochy
Agnesa Pillon
author_facet Marie-Pierre de Partz
Aliette Lochy
Agnesa Pillon
author_sort Marie-Pierre de Partz
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, we report a detailed analysis of the impaired performance of a dysgraphic individual, AD, who produced similar rates of letter-level errors in written spelling, oral spelling, and typing. We found that the distribution of various letter error types displayed a distinct pattern in written spelling on the one hand and in oral spelling and typing on the other. In particular, noncontextual letter substitution errors (i.e., errors in which the erroneous letter that replaces the target letter does not occur elsewhere within the word) were virtually absent in oral spelling and typing and mainly found in written spelling. In contrast, letter deletion errors and multiple-letter errors were typically found in oral spelling and very exceptional in written spelling. Only contextual letter substitution errors (i.e., errors in which the erroneous letter that replaces the target letter is identical to a letter occurring earlier or later in the word) were found in similar proportions in the three tasks. We argue that these contrasting patterns of letter error distribution result from damage to two distinct levels of letter representation and processing within the spelling system, namely, the amodal graphemic representation held in the graphemic buffer and the letter form representation computed by subsequent writing-specific processes. Then, we examined the relationship between error and target in the letter substitution errors produced in written and oral spelling and found evidence that distinct types of letter representation are processed at each of the hypothetized levels of damage: symbolic letter representation at the graphemic level and representation of the component graphic strokes at the letter form processing level.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ea61d3515d44286baca408b899661d5
institution Kabale University
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-7ea61d3515d44286baca408b899661d52025-02-03T01:24:40ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842005-01-01162-311914410.1155/2005/741623Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple DeficitsMarie-Pierre de Partz0Aliette Lochy1Agnesa Pillon2Université Catholique de Louvain, BelgiumUniversité Catholique de Louvain, BelgiumUniversité Catholique de Louvain, BelgiumIn this paper, we report a detailed analysis of the impaired performance of a dysgraphic individual, AD, who produced similar rates of letter-level errors in written spelling, oral spelling, and typing. We found that the distribution of various letter error types displayed a distinct pattern in written spelling on the one hand and in oral spelling and typing on the other. In particular, noncontextual letter substitution errors (i.e., errors in which the erroneous letter that replaces the target letter does not occur elsewhere within the word) were virtually absent in oral spelling and typing and mainly found in written spelling. In contrast, letter deletion errors and multiple-letter errors were typically found in oral spelling and very exceptional in written spelling. Only contextual letter substitution errors (i.e., errors in which the erroneous letter that replaces the target letter is identical to a letter occurring earlier or later in the word) were found in similar proportions in the three tasks. We argue that these contrasting patterns of letter error distribution result from damage to two distinct levels of letter representation and processing within the spelling system, namely, the amodal graphemic representation held in the graphemic buffer and the letter form representation computed by subsequent writing-specific processes. Then, we examined the relationship between error and target in the letter substitution errors produced in written and oral spelling and found evidence that distinct types of letter representation are processed at each of the hypothetized levels of damage: symbolic letter representation at the graphemic level and representation of the component graphic strokes at the letter form processing level.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/741623
spellingShingle Marie-Pierre de Partz
Aliette Lochy
Agnesa Pillon
Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
Behavioural Neurology
title Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
title_full Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
title_fullStr Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
title_short Multiple Levels of Letter Representation in Written Spelling: Evidence From a Single Case of Dysgraphia with Multiple Deficits
title_sort multiple levels of letter representation in written spelling evidence from a single case of dysgraphia with multiple deficits
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/741623
work_keys_str_mv AT mariepierredepartz multiplelevelsofletterrepresentationinwrittenspellingevidencefromasinglecaseofdysgraphiawithmultipledeficits
AT aliettelochy multiplelevelsofletterrepresentationinwrittenspellingevidencefromasinglecaseofdysgraphiawithmultipledeficits
AT agnesapillon multiplelevelsofletterrepresentationinwrittenspellingevidencefromasinglecaseofdysgraphiawithmultipledeficits