How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model

Although transport mode choice in commuting from home to work has been studied extensively, no prior research has investigated mode choice as an emotional response to external stimuli using the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. Therefore, this study applies the SOR model to explore commuters’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ludfi Djakfar, Melchior Bria, Achmad Wicaksono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Transportation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555488
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552989715333120
author Ludfi Djakfar
Melchior Bria
Achmad Wicaksono
author_facet Ludfi Djakfar
Melchior Bria
Achmad Wicaksono
author_sort Ludfi Djakfar
collection DOAJ
description Although transport mode choice in commuting from home to work has been studied extensively, no prior research has investigated mode choice as an emotional response to external stimuli using the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. Therefore, this study applies the SOR model to explore commuters’ transport mode choice behaviour. The stimulus variables include trip characteristics, transport infrastructure and services, environment, and work characteristics; the organism variable includes the travel experience and attitude of the individual; and the response variables include use of public transport, private transport, and e-hailing. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey of 500 formal-sector workers in Jakarta; 430 respondents provided valid responses for analysis. The survey data were analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. The results showed that the stimulus variables, namely, trip characteristics, transport infrastructure, environment, and work characteristics, had indirect effects on the choice of e-hailing through organism factors (travel experience and attitude). Also, the environment and work characteristic variables had an indirect effect on the choice of private transport through organism factors. Stimulus variables had no indirect effects on public transport usage. When travel experience was the stimulus variable, the indirect effect on public transport usage through attitude as the organism variable was significant. The response to the use of transport modes showed dynamic behaviour, depending on the provided stimulus and organism. These findings can be beneficial for establishing a more comprehensive strategy that includes the provision of infrastructure, improvement of transit service, the built environment, and employers’ policies to realise a sustainable commuting trip.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c333865c8a54bbdbeec5c4433e49981
institution Kabale University
issn 2042-3195
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Transportation
spelling doaj-art-7c333865c8a54bbdbeec5c4433e499812025-02-03T05:57:20ZengWileyJournal of Advanced Transportation2042-31952021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5555488How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response ModelLudfi Djakfar0Melchior Bria1Achmad Wicaksono2Department of Civil EngineeringDepartment of Civil EngineeringDepartment of Civil EngineeringAlthough transport mode choice in commuting from home to work has been studied extensively, no prior research has investigated mode choice as an emotional response to external stimuli using the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. Therefore, this study applies the SOR model to explore commuters’ transport mode choice behaviour. The stimulus variables include trip characteristics, transport infrastructure and services, environment, and work characteristics; the organism variable includes the travel experience and attitude of the individual; and the response variables include use of public transport, private transport, and e-hailing. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey of 500 formal-sector workers in Jakarta; 430 respondents provided valid responses for analysis. The survey data were analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. The results showed that the stimulus variables, namely, trip characteristics, transport infrastructure, environment, and work characteristics, had indirect effects on the choice of e-hailing through organism factors (travel experience and attitude). Also, the environment and work characteristic variables had an indirect effect on the choice of private transport through organism factors. Stimulus variables had no indirect effects on public transport usage. When travel experience was the stimulus variable, the indirect effect on public transport usage through attitude as the organism variable was significant. The response to the use of transport modes showed dynamic behaviour, depending on the provided stimulus and organism. These findings can be beneficial for establishing a more comprehensive strategy that includes the provision of infrastructure, improvement of transit service, the built environment, and employers’ policies to realise a sustainable commuting trip.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555488
spellingShingle Ludfi Djakfar
Melchior Bria
Achmad Wicaksono
How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
Journal of Advanced Transportation
title How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
title_full How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
title_fullStr How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
title_full_unstemmed How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
title_short How Employees Choose their Commuting Transport Mode: Analysis Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model
title_sort how employees choose their commuting transport mode analysis using the stimulus organism response model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555488
work_keys_str_mv AT ludfidjakfar howemployeeschoosetheircommutingtransportmodeanalysisusingthestimulusorganismresponsemodel
AT melchiorbria howemployeeschoosetheircommutingtransportmodeanalysisusingthestimulusorganismresponsemodel
AT achmadwicaksono howemployeeschoosetheircommutingtransportmodeanalysisusingthestimulusorganismresponsemodel