Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure

Purpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuta Sakaue, Jun Ueda, Masaaki Seki, Takayuki Tanaka, Tetsuya Togano, Takaiko Yoshino, Takeo Fukuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554428989702144
author Yuta Sakaue
Jun Ueda
Masaaki Seki
Takayuki Tanaka
Tetsuya Togano
Takaiko Yoshino
Takeo Fukuchi
author_facet Yuta Sakaue
Jun Ueda
Masaaki Seki
Takayuki Tanaka
Tetsuya Togano
Takaiko Yoshino
Takeo Fukuchi
author_sort Yuta Sakaue
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using either sGAT or dGAT, which was randomly chosen. After a 5-minute interval, the next set of three consecutive IOP was measured using the other GAT. Results. The mean IOP measured with sGAT was 16.27 ± 6.68 mmHg and 16.35 ± 6.69 mmHg with dGAT. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.998 (P<0.01). The subjects were divided into three groups based on the mean IOP: IOP < 14 mmHg, 14–20 mmHg, or >20 mmHg. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient within each group was 0.935, 0.972, and 0.997 (P<0.01), respectively. The difference within the three consecutive IOP measurements (maximum–minimum) for dGAT (0.72 ± 0.34 mmHg) was significantly smaller than those with sGAT (0.92 ± 0.42 mmHg, P<0.01). Even in patients with equal IOP (zero left-right difference) with sGAT (n=30), dGAT detected IOP differences between the left and right eyes (0.47 ± 0.31 mmHg). Conclusion. Compared to sGAT, dGAT measurements are highly reproducible and less variable.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c1f69ab7d6a4455a93b853f89fdcdc7
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-7c1f69ab7d6a4455a93b853f89fdcdc72025-02-03T05:51:37ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582014-01-01201410.1155/2014/461681461681Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular PressureYuta Sakaue0Jun Ueda1Masaaki Seki2Takayuki Tanaka3Tetsuya Togano4Takaiko Yoshino5Takeo Fukuchi6Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanPurpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using either sGAT or dGAT, which was randomly chosen. After a 5-minute interval, the next set of three consecutive IOP was measured using the other GAT. Results. The mean IOP measured with sGAT was 16.27 ± 6.68 mmHg and 16.35 ± 6.69 mmHg with dGAT. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.998 (P<0.01). The subjects were divided into three groups based on the mean IOP: IOP < 14 mmHg, 14–20 mmHg, or >20 mmHg. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient within each group was 0.935, 0.972, and 0.997 (P<0.01), respectively. The difference within the three consecutive IOP measurements (maximum–minimum) for dGAT (0.72 ± 0.34 mmHg) was significantly smaller than those with sGAT (0.92 ± 0.42 mmHg, P<0.01). Even in patients with equal IOP (zero left-right difference) with sGAT (n=30), dGAT detected IOP differences between the left and right eyes (0.47 ± 0.31 mmHg). Conclusion. Compared to sGAT, dGAT measurements are highly reproducible and less variable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681
spellingShingle Yuta Sakaue
Jun Ueda
Masaaki Seki
Takayuki Tanaka
Tetsuya Togano
Takaiko Yoshino
Takeo Fukuchi
Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
title_full Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
title_fullStr Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
title_short Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
title_sort evaluation of the new digital goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681
work_keys_str_mv AT yutasakaue evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT junueda evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT masaakiseki evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT takayukitanaka evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT tetsuyatogano evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT takaikoyoshino evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure
AT takeofukuchi evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure