Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
Purpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832554428989702144 |
---|---|
author | Yuta Sakaue Jun Ueda Masaaki Seki Takayuki Tanaka Tetsuya Togano Takaiko Yoshino Takeo Fukuchi |
author_facet | Yuta Sakaue Jun Ueda Masaaki Seki Takayuki Tanaka Tetsuya Togano Takaiko Yoshino Takeo Fukuchi |
author_sort | Yuta Sakaue |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using either sGAT or dGAT, which was randomly chosen. After a 5-minute interval, the next set of three consecutive IOP was measured using the other GAT. Results. The mean IOP measured with sGAT was 16.27 ± 6.68 mmHg and 16.35 ± 6.69 mmHg with dGAT. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.998 (P<0.01). The subjects were divided into three groups based on the mean IOP: IOP < 14 mmHg, 14–20 mmHg, or >20 mmHg. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient within each group was 0.935, 0.972, and 0.997 (P<0.01), respectively. The difference within the three consecutive IOP measurements (maximum–minimum) for dGAT (0.72 ± 0.34 mmHg) was significantly smaller than those with sGAT (0.92 ± 0.42 mmHg, P<0.01). Even in patients with equal IOP (zero left-right difference) with sGAT (n=30), dGAT detected IOP differences between the left and right eyes (0.47 ± 0.31 mmHg). Conclusion. Compared to sGAT, dGAT measurements are highly reproducible and less variable. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-7c1f69ab7d6a4455a93b853f89fdcdc7 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
spelling | doaj-art-7c1f69ab7d6a4455a93b853f89fdcdc72025-02-03T05:51:37ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582014-01-01201410.1155/2014/461681461681Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular PressureYuta Sakaue0Jun Ueda1Masaaki Seki2Takayuki Tanaka3Tetsuya Togano4Takaiko Yoshino5Takeo Fukuchi6Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, JapanPurpose. To compare a new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer (dGAT) that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) in 0.1 mmHg increments to a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (sGAT). Methods. This study included 116 eyes of 60 subjects. A single examiner first measured IOP in triplicate using either sGAT or dGAT, which was randomly chosen. After a 5-minute interval, the next set of three consecutive IOP was measured using the other GAT. Results. The mean IOP measured with sGAT was 16.27 ± 6.68 mmHg and 16.35 ± 6.69 mmHg with dGAT. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.998 (P<0.01). The subjects were divided into three groups based on the mean IOP: IOP < 14 mmHg, 14–20 mmHg, or >20 mmHg. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient within each group was 0.935, 0.972, and 0.997 (P<0.01), respectively. The difference within the three consecutive IOP measurements (maximum–minimum) for dGAT (0.72 ± 0.34 mmHg) was significantly smaller than those with sGAT (0.92 ± 0.42 mmHg, P<0.01). Even in patients with equal IOP (zero left-right difference) with sGAT (n=30), dGAT detected IOP differences between the left and right eyes (0.47 ± 0.31 mmHg). Conclusion. Compared to sGAT, dGAT measurements are highly reproducible and less variable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681 |
spellingShingle | Yuta Sakaue Jun Ueda Masaaki Seki Takayuki Tanaka Tetsuya Togano Takaiko Yoshino Takeo Fukuchi Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure Journal of Ophthalmology |
title | Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure |
title_full | Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure |
title_short | Evaluation of the New Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure |
title_sort | evaluation of the new digital goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/461681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yutasakaue evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT junueda evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT masaakiseki evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT takayukitanaka evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT tetsuyatogano evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT takaikoyoshino evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure AT takeofukuchi evaluationofthenewdigitalgoldmannapplanationtonometerformeasuringintraocularpressure |