Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law

The discourse surrounding corruption as an international crime is increasingly urgent, as it transcends national borders and contributes to economic crises, conflicts, and various crimes that threaten global security. Scholars such as Christensen (2017), Peters (2018), Davis (2018), and Rothe (2010)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung 2024-10-01
Series:Lampung Journal of International Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/lajil/article/view/3363
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542518575628288
author Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
author_facet Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
author_sort Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
collection DOAJ
description The discourse surrounding corruption as an international crime is increasingly urgent, as it transcends national borders and contributes to economic crises, conflicts, and various crimes that threaten global security. Scholars such as Christensen (2017), Peters (2018), Davis (2018), and Rothe (2010) have linked corruption to human rights violations, revealing that states often struggle to address it effectively. This research seeks to explore how corruption can be redefined as an international crime and what legal accountability mechanisms exist for perpetrators within international law, while also examining the opportunities for the international community to recognize corruption as an international crime. The findings suggest that corruption crimes impacting security, human rights, and environmental integrity, particularly in contexts where states are unable or unwilling to act, should be classified as international crimes, necessitating a global commitment to amend the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) accordingly. Furthermore, the potential for universal jurisdiction over corruption is explored, whether through amending the 1998 Rome Statute or establishing an ad hoc international tribunal, although significant obstacles remain due to states’ commitments to their sovereignty and criminal jurisdiction.
format Article
id doaj-art-7a62e952dcc94c91a70380cf4d75a008
institution Kabale University
issn 2656-6532
2723-2603
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
record_format Article
series Lampung Journal of International Law
spelling doaj-art-7a62e952dcc94c91a70380cf4d75a0082025-02-04T02:28:31ZengFaculty of Law, Universitas LampungLampung Journal of International Law2656-65322723-26032024-10-0162556810.25041/lajil.v6i2.33632093Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International LawSatria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-1734Universitas Muhammadiyah SurabayaThe discourse surrounding corruption as an international crime is increasingly urgent, as it transcends national borders and contributes to economic crises, conflicts, and various crimes that threaten global security. Scholars such as Christensen (2017), Peters (2018), Davis (2018), and Rothe (2010) have linked corruption to human rights violations, revealing that states often struggle to address it effectively. This research seeks to explore how corruption can be redefined as an international crime and what legal accountability mechanisms exist for perpetrators within international law, while also examining the opportunities for the international community to recognize corruption as an international crime. The findings suggest that corruption crimes impacting security, human rights, and environmental integrity, particularly in contexts where states are unable or unwilling to act, should be classified as international crimes, necessitating a global commitment to amend the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) accordingly. Furthermore, the potential for universal jurisdiction over corruption is explored, whether through amending the 1998 Rome Statute or establishing an ad hoc international tribunal, although significant obstacles remain due to states’ commitments to their sovereignty and criminal jurisdiction.https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/lajil/article/view/3363corruptioninternational crimesjurisdictionuncacicc
spellingShingle Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
Lampung Journal of International Law
corruption
international crimes
jurisdiction
uncac
icc
title Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
title_full Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
title_fullStr Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
title_full_unstemmed Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
title_short Reconceptualizing Corruption as an International Crime: A Review of International Law
title_sort reconceptualizing corruption as an international crime a review of international law
topic corruption
international crimes
jurisdiction
uncac
icc
url https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/lajil/article/view/3363
work_keys_str_mv AT satriaunggulwicaksanaprakasa reconceptualizingcorruptionasaninternationalcrimeareviewofinternationallaw