Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020.Eligibilit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e051073.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832574042177011712 |
|---|---|
| author | Gareth Jones Mark I. Johnson Carole A. Paley Matthew R. Mulvey Priscilla G. Wittkopf |
| author_facet | Gareth Jones Mark I. Johnson Carole A. Paley Matthew R. Mulvey Priscilla G. Wittkopf |
| author_sort | Gareth Jones |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020.Eligibility criteria for study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing strong non-painful TENS at or close to the site of pain versus placebo or other treatments in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis.Data extraction and synthesis Reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB, Cochrane tool) and certainty of evidence (Grading and Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Mean pain intensity and proportions of participants achieving reductions of pain intensity (≥30% or >50%) during or immediately after TENS. Random effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios. Subgroup analyses were related to trial methodology and characteristics of pain.Results The review included 381 RCTs (24 532 participants). Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo (91 RCTs, 92 samples, n=4841, SMD=−0·96 (95% CI −1·14 to –0·78), moderate-certainty evidence). Methodological (eg, RoB, sample size) and pain characteristics (eg, acute vs chronic, diagnosis) did not modify the effect. Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used as part of standard of care (61 RCTs, 61 samples, n=3155, SMD = −0·72 (95% CI −0·95 to –0·50], low-certainty evidence). Levels of evidence were downgraded because of small-sized trials contributing to imprecision in magnitude estimates. Data were limited for other outcomes including adverse events which were poorly reported, generally mild and not different to comparators.Conclusion There was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125054. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-79f91679c2ce4f09891a6c36df0901b0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-79f91679c2ce4f09891a6c36df0901b02025-02-02T01:10:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-02-0112210.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)Gareth Jones0Mark I. Johnson1Carole A. Paley2Matthew R. Mulvey3Priscilla G. Wittkopf4University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKCentre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UKCentre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UKLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKCentre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UKObjective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020.Eligibility criteria for study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing strong non-painful TENS at or close to the site of pain versus placebo or other treatments in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis.Data extraction and synthesis Reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB, Cochrane tool) and certainty of evidence (Grading and Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Mean pain intensity and proportions of participants achieving reductions of pain intensity (≥30% or >50%) during or immediately after TENS. Random effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios. Subgroup analyses were related to trial methodology and characteristics of pain.Results The review included 381 RCTs (24 532 participants). Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo (91 RCTs, 92 samples, n=4841, SMD=−0·96 (95% CI −1·14 to –0·78), moderate-certainty evidence). Methodological (eg, RoB, sample size) and pain characteristics (eg, acute vs chronic, diagnosis) did not modify the effect. Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used as part of standard of care (61 RCTs, 61 samples, n=3155, SMD = −0·72 (95% CI −0·95 to –0·50], low-certainty evidence). Levels of evidence were downgraded because of small-sized trials contributing to imprecision in magnitude estimates. Data were limited for other outcomes including adverse events which were poorly reported, generally mild and not different to comparators.Conclusion There was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125054.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e051073.full |
| spellingShingle | Gareth Jones Mark I. Johnson Carole A. Paley Matthew R. Mulvey Priscilla G. Wittkopf Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) BMJ Open |
| title | Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) |
| title_full | Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) |
| title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) |
| title_short | Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study) |
| title_sort | efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation tens for acute and chronic pain in adults a systematic review and meta analysis of 381 studies the meta tens study |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e051073.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garethjones efficacyandsafetyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforacuteandchronicpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof381studiesthemetatensstudy AT markijohnson efficacyandsafetyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforacuteandchronicpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof381studiesthemetatensstudy AT caroleapaley efficacyandsafetyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforacuteandchronicpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof381studiesthemetatensstudy AT matthewrmulvey efficacyandsafetyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforacuteandchronicpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof381studiesthemetatensstudy AT priscillagwittkopf efficacyandsafetyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforacuteandchronicpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof381studiesthemetatensstudy |