Assessing the impact of introductory programming workshops on the computational reproducibility of biomedical workflows.
<h4>Introduction</h4>As biomedical research becomes more data-intensive, computational reproducibility is a growing area of importance. Unfortunately, many biomedical researchers have not received formal computational training and often struggle to produce results that can be reproduced...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Ariel Deardorff |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230697&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Trust but Verify: How to Leverage Policies, Workflows, and Infrastructure to Ensure Computational Reproducibility in Publication
by: Craig Willis, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Computer-Assisted Evaluation of Zygomatic Fracture Outcomes: Case Series and Proposal of a Reproducible Workflow
by: Simone Benedetti, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
First-principles Hubbard parameters with automated and reproducible workflows
by: Lorenzo Bastonero, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
A reproducible workflow for assembling the mitochondrial genome of Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)
by: Somjit Homchan, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows
by: Ove Johan Ragnar Gustafsson, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)