Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy

Just war theory, significantly shaped by Christian moral theology, has provided a prominent ethical framework for discussions on the justice of war. Numerous works have been published on classical Chinese counterparts, including passages from the <i>Mengzi</i>, <i>Mozi</i>, &...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ting-mien Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/46
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587649671495680
author Ting-mien Lee
author_facet Ting-mien Lee
author_sort Ting-mien Lee
collection DOAJ
description Just war theory, significantly shaped by Christian moral theology, has provided a prominent ethical framework for discussions on the justice of war. Numerous works have been published on classical Chinese counterparts, including passages from the <i>Mengzi</i>, <i>Mozi</i>, <i>Xunzi</i>, and <i>Huangdi Sijing</i>. Although the <i>Zhuangzi</i> frequently discusses warfare, it has been largely overlooked in this field of research because its war ethics do not revolve around any concept similar to that of justice. Based on Zhuangzian critiques of Confucian and Mohist views on justice, this paper tentatively reconstructs Zhuangzian war ethics. This reconstruction reveals a perspective that the concept of just war or justified war is inherently problematic, and promoting such ideas can be perilous and even morally questionable. The belief that just war theory can help us identify a “just side” to morally condemn or legally restrain aggressors is a dangerous illusion. In practice, this approach fails to prevent wars and often exacerbates conflict. According to the Zhuangzian perspective, during wars, states do not operate as traditional political entities with universal jurisdiction and centralized authority. Instead, they resemble rivers and lakes with indistinct boundaries, rendering the concepts of justice and punishment largely irrelevant. A practical peace strategy, therefore, must abandon the pursuit of administering justice and punishing wrongdoers. Instead, it should focus on strategies that facilitate the involved parties to “forget” their grudges and start their peaceful relationship anew.
format Article
id doaj-art-78ed5160e10e49fe84cb1bfd97fbc44d
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-78ed5160e10e49fe84cb1bfd97fbc44d2025-01-24T13:47:25ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442025-01-011614610.3390/rel16010046Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace StrategyTing-mien Lee0Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of Macau, Macau 999078, ChinaJust war theory, significantly shaped by Christian moral theology, has provided a prominent ethical framework for discussions on the justice of war. Numerous works have been published on classical Chinese counterparts, including passages from the <i>Mengzi</i>, <i>Mozi</i>, <i>Xunzi</i>, and <i>Huangdi Sijing</i>. Although the <i>Zhuangzi</i> frequently discusses warfare, it has been largely overlooked in this field of research because its war ethics do not revolve around any concept similar to that of justice. Based on Zhuangzian critiques of Confucian and Mohist views on justice, this paper tentatively reconstructs Zhuangzian war ethics. This reconstruction reveals a perspective that the concept of just war or justified war is inherently problematic, and promoting such ideas can be perilous and even morally questionable. The belief that just war theory can help us identify a “just side” to morally condemn or legally restrain aggressors is a dangerous illusion. In practice, this approach fails to prevent wars and often exacerbates conflict. According to the Zhuangzian perspective, during wars, states do not operate as traditional political entities with universal jurisdiction and centralized authority. Instead, they resemble rivers and lakes with indistinct boundaries, rendering the concepts of justice and punishment largely irrelevant. A practical peace strategy, therefore, must abandon the pursuit of administering justice and punishing wrongdoers. Instead, it should focus on strategies that facilitate the involved parties to “forget” their grudges and start their peaceful relationship anew.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/46war ethicsjust war theorycomparative philosophyChinese philosophyZhuangzi
spellingShingle Ting-mien Lee
Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
Religions
war ethics
just war theory
comparative philosophy
Chinese philosophy
Zhuangzi
title Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
title_full Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
title_fullStr Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
title_short Rivers and Lakes: Zhuangzi’s Critique of Just War and the Zhuangzian War Ethics and Peace Strategy
title_sort rivers and lakes zhuangzi s critique of just war and the zhuangzian war ethics and peace strategy
topic war ethics
just war theory
comparative philosophy
Chinese philosophy
Zhuangzi
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/46
work_keys_str_mv AT tingmienlee riversandlakeszhuangziscritiqueofjustwarandthezhuangzianwarethicsandpeacestrategy