Défense des classes dominantes : la division du travail de légitimation à l’épreuve des scandales financiers internationaux

The article aims to carefully examine the reactions to the Panama Papers scandal in the light of the sociological literature on elites’ resistance to stigmas. More specifically, this article is focused on the defensive narratives of the persons targeted by the wave of revelations in the media. It al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Amicelle, Jean Bérard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2018-01-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12435
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The article aims to carefully examine the reactions to the Panama Papers scandal in the light of the sociological literature on elites’ resistance to stigmas. More specifically, this article is focused on the defensive narratives of the persons targeted by the wave of revelations in the media. It also sheds light on the responses from the French government and key commentators over the French media. In this respect, we argue that this range of positions expressed on such matters largely relates to a common guiding principle contributing to the protection of the existing financial order. Indeed, the relative diversity of reactions rather refers to a division of labour – for legitimating power and domination – between the owners of economic and financial capital, the holders of State power and journalists, editorialists as well as other experts and media personalities who express their ideas in the name of their cultural capital.
ISSN:1957-7796