Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial

Purpose. To evaluate whether limited vitrectomy is as effective as complete vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to compare the surgical times and rates of complications. Methods. In this multicentre European study, data of eyes with ERM that underwent vitrectomy from January 2017 t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matteo Forlini, Purva Date, Domenico D’Eliseo, Paolo Rossini, Adriana Bratu, Andrea Volinia, Giovanni Neri, Tommaso Verdina, Maria Rosaria Carbotti, Gian Maria Cavallini, Luigi Sborgia, Alessandra Galeone, Aurelio Imburgia, Alessandro Mularoni, Alessandro Meduri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6871207
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563364988977152
author Matteo Forlini
Purva Date
Domenico D’Eliseo
Paolo Rossini
Adriana Bratu
Andrea Volinia
Giovanni Neri
Tommaso Verdina
Maria Rosaria Carbotti
Gian Maria Cavallini
Luigi Sborgia
Alessandra Galeone
Aurelio Imburgia
Alessandro Mularoni
Alessandro Meduri
author_facet Matteo Forlini
Purva Date
Domenico D’Eliseo
Paolo Rossini
Adriana Bratu
Andrea Volinia
Giovanni Neri
Tommaso Verdina
Maria Rosaria Carbotti
Gian Maria Cavallini
Luigi Sborgia
Alessandra Galeone
Aurelio Imburgia
Alessandro Mularoni
Alessandro Meduri
author_sort Matteo Forlini
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To evaluate whether limited vitrectomy is as effective as complete vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to compare the surgical times and rates of complications. Methods. In this multicentre European study, data of eyes with ERM that underwent vitrectomy from January 2017 to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. In the limited vitrectomy group, a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was induced up till the equator as opposed to complete PVD induction till the vitreous base in the comparison group. Incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks, retinal detachment, surgical time, and visual outcomes were compared between groups. Results. We included 139 eyes in the analysis with a mean age being 72.2 ± 6.9 years. In this, sixty-five eyes (47%) underwent limited vitrectomy and 74 eyes (53%) underwent complete vitrectomy. Iatrogenic retinal tears were seen in both groups (5% in limited vitrectomy versus 7% in complete vitrectomy, p=0.49). Retinal detachment occurred in 2 eyes in the limited vitrectomy group (3%) compared to none in the complete vitrectomy group (p=0.22). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness improved significantly with no intergroup differences (p=0.18). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the limited vitrectomy group with 91% surgeries taking less than 1 hour compared to 71% in the complete vitrectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion. A limited vitrectomy is a time-efficient and effective surgical procedure for removal of epiretinal membrane with no additional complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-7863ea36b23147c2a6a7adb23b0663e7
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-7863ea36b23147c2a6a7adb23b0663e72025-02-03T01:20:20ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/68712076871207Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter TrialMatteo Forlini0Purva Date1Domenico D’Eliseo2Paolo Rossini3Adriana Bratu4Andrea Volinia5Giovanni Neri6Tommaso Verdina7Maria Rosaria Carbotti8Gian Maria Cavallini9Luigi Sborgia10Alessandra Galeone11Aurelio Imburgia12Alessandro Mularoni13Alessandro Meduri14Division of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USAValvekar Medical & Research Centre, Solapur, Maharashtra, IndiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, “S. Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, “S. Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, “S. Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, “S. Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, ItalyInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, ItalyDivision of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USADivision of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USAClinic of Ophthalmology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, ItalyPurpose. To evaluate whether limited vitrectomy is as effective as complete vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to compare the surgical times and rates of complications. Methods. In this multicentre European study, data of eyes with ERM that underwent vitrectomy from January 2017 to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. In the limited vitrectomy group, a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was induced up till the equator as opposed to complete PVD induction till the vitreous base in the comparison group. Incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks, retinal detachment, surgical time, and visual outcomes were compared between groups. Results. We included 139 eyes in the analysis with a mean age being 72.2 ± 6.9 years. In this, sixty-five eyes (47%) underwent limited vitrectomy and 74 eyes (53%) underwent complete vitrectomy. Iatrogenic retinal tears were seen in both groups (5% in limited vitrectomy versus 7% in complete vitrectomy, p=0.49). Retinal detachment occurred in 2 eyes in the limited vitrectomy group (3%) compared to none in the complete vitrectomy group (p=0.22). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness improved significantly with no intergroup differences (p=0.18). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the limited vitrectomy group with 91% surgeries taking less than 1 hour compared to 71% in the complete vitrectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion. A limited vitrectomy is a time-efficient and effective surgical procedure for removal of epiretinal membrane with no additional complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6871207
spellingShingle Matteo Forlini
Purva Date
Domenico D’Eliseo
Paolo Rossini
Adriana Bratu
Andrea Volinia
Giovanni Neri
Tommaso Verdina
Maria Rosaria Carbotti
Gian Maria Cavallini
Luigi Sborgia
Alessandra Galeone
Aurelio Imburgia
Alessandro Mularoni
Alessandro Meduri
Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
title_full Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
title_fullStr Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
title_full_unstemmed Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
title_short Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial
title_sort limited vitrectomy versus complete vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes a comparative multicenter trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6871207
work_keys_str_mv AT matteoforlini limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT purvadate limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT domenicodeliseo limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT paolorossini limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT adrianabratu limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT andreavolinia limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT giovannineri limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT tommasoverdina limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT mariarosariacarbotti limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT gianmariacavallini limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT luigisborgia limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT alessandragaleone limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT aurelioimburgia limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT alessandromularoni limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial
AT alessandromeduri limitedvitrectomyversuscompletevitrectomyforepiretinalmembranesacomparativemulticentertrial