Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)

In his preface to Oliver Twist, Dickens insists that his depiction of the London underworld is deprived of ‘allurements and fascinations’, and states his didactic ambition to offer a realistic description of this grim universe. Yet, in many ways, the text itself is led astray from this normative pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clémence Folléa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2014-06-01
Series:Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/cve/1145
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581240864112640
author Clémence Folléa
author_facet Clémence Folléa
author_sort Clémence Folléa
collection DOAJ
description In his preface to Oliver Twist, Dickens insists that his depiction of the London underworld is deprived of ‘allurements and fascinations’, and states his didactic ambition to offer a realistic description of this grim universe. Yet, in many ways, the text itself is led astray from this normative path, and the aesthetics of Oliver Twist’s criminal world thwarts the ideology expressed in the preface. After having examined how Dickens’s novel is fundamentally structured by an interplay of norms and transgressions, I propose to look at two recent adaptations which fully appropriate the ambivalence of their source text. Twist and Boy Called Twist both respond to the didactic ideology of Oliver Twist and make the most of the novel’s subversive potential. In the end, these two films deploy many latent aspects of the text, thus redefining the terms in which we read Oliver Twist. By breaking away from traditional readings of the novel, they transgress our relation to this canonical text, which continues to resist attempts at normalisation and normative interpretations. This paper takes into account not only the aesthetics of these adaptations but also their contexts of production, in which Oliver Twist’s potential for resistance takes on new meanings and new purposes.
format Article
id doaj-art-768eeb8112ae4dedb0a8af82ec8f4f65
institution Kabale University
issn 0220-5610
2271-6149
language English
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
spelling doaj-art-768eeb8112ae4dedb0a8af82ec8f4f652025-01-30T10:21:52ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeCahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens0220-56102271-61492014-06-017910.4000/cve.1145Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)Clémence FolléaIn his preface to Oliver Twist, Dickens insists that his depiction of the London underworld is deprived of ‘allurements and fascinations’, and states his didactic ambition to offer a realistic description of this grim universe. Yet, in many ways, the text itself is led astray from this normative path, and the aesthetics of Oliver Twist’s criminal world thwarts the ideology expressed in the preface. After having examined how Dickens’s novel is fundamentally structured by an interplay of norms and transgressions, I propose to look at two recent adaptations which fully appropriate the ambivalence of their source text. Twist and Boy Called Twist both respond to the didactic ideology of Oliver Twist and make the most of the novel’s subversive potential. In the end, these two films deploy many latent aspects of the text, thus redefining the terms in which we read Oliver Twist. By breaking away from traditional readings of the novel, they transgress our relation to this canonical text, which continues to resist attempts at normalisation and normative interpretations. This paper takes into account not only the aesthetics of these adaptations but also their contexts of production, in which Oliver Twist’s potential for resistance takes on new meanings and new purposes.https://journals.openedition.org/cve/1145Dickens (Charles)adaptationOliver TwistpersistencecanonDickensian
spellingShingle Clémence Folléa
Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Dickens (Charles)
adaptation
Oliver Twist
persistence
canon
Dickensian
title Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
title_full Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
title_fullStr Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
title_full_unstemmed Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
title_short Normative Ideology, Transgressive Aesthetics: Depicting and Exploring the Urban Underworld in Oliver Twist (1838), Twist (2003) and Boy Called Twist (2004)
title_sort normative ideology transgressive aesthetics depicting and exploring the urban underworld in oliver twist 1838 twist 2003 and boy called twist 2004
topic Dickens (Charles)
adaptation
Oliver Twist
persistence
canon
Dickensian
url https://journals.openedition.org/cve/1145
work_keys_str_mv AT clemencefollea normativeideologytransgressiveaestheticsdepictingandexploringtheurbanunderworldinolivertwist1838twist2003andboycalledtwist2004