Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation

Trifluralin is one of the most widely used herbicides, being accounted as the cause of cancer in human. In the present research, the UV/S2O82− and ZnO/UV processes’ efficiency in the removal of trifluralin was investigated. A lab scale equipped with a UV lamp was applied. The parameters were studied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Sadeghi, Abdolmajid Fadaei, Fazel Mohammadi-Moghadam, Sara Hemati, Gashtasb Mardani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9964291
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550492663709696
author Fatemeh Sadeghi
Abdolmajid Fadaei
Fazel Mohammadi-Moghadam
Sara Hemati
Gashtasb Mardani
author_facet Fatemeh Sadeghi
Abdolmajid Fadaei
Fazel Mohammadi-Moghadam
Sara Hemati
Gashtasb Mardani
author_sort Fatemeh Sadeghi
collection DOAJ
description Trifluralin is one of the most widely used herbicides, being accounted as the cause of cancer in human. In the present research, the UV/S2O82− and ZnO/UV processes’ efficiency in the removal of trifluralin was investigated. A lab scale equipped with a UV lamp was applied. The parameters were studied, including initial trifluralin concentration (0.4–1.2 mg/L), contact time (20–60 min), S2O82− concentration (20–60 μM), and ZnO concentration (50–150 mg/L). The remained trifluralin concentration was measured by HPLC. This study proved the trifluralin removal of 92.90 ± 1.6% and 87.91 ± 19.22% for UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO processes in the best operation conditions (contact time of 60 min, the persulfate concentration of 40 μM, and the ZnO concentration of 100 mg/L). The optimal trifluraline concentrations were 1.2 mg/L and 0.6 mg/L for UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO processes, respectively. In both processes, the removal efficiency of trifluralin increased significantly with increasing contact time. The findings exhibited that both processes UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO followed the zero-order kinetic. The electrical energy consumed of UV/S2O82 and UV/ZnO was about 43.95 and 20.41 Kwh/kg, respectively. The results show that UV/S2O82− and ZnO/UV processes were appropriate as the effective treatment method for trifluralin removal. Therefore, it is proposed to study the performance of these processes as an environmentally friendly practice in full scale with real wastewater.
format Article
id doaj-art-702b78a6532f4c4681e880e9ddf1eccb
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-806X
1687-8078
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Chemical Engineering
spelling doaj-art-702b78a6532f4c4681e880e9ddf1eccb2025-02-03T06:06:34ZengWileyInternational Journal of Chemical Engineering1687-806X1687-80782021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99642919964291Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost EstimationFatemeh Sadeghi0Abdolmajid Fadaei1Fazel Mohammadi-Moghadam2Sara Hemati3Gashtasb Mardani4Research Committe, Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IranDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IranDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IranDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IranMedical Plants and Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, IranTrifluralin is one of the most widely used herbicides, being accounted as the cause of cancer in human. In the present research, the UV/S2O82− and ZnO/UV processes’ efficiency in the removal of trifluralin was investigated. A lab scale equipped with a UV lamp was applied. The parameters were studied, including initial trifluralin concentration (0.4–1.2 mg/L), contact time (20–60 min), S2O82− concentration (20–60 μM), and ZnO concentration (50–150 mg/L). The remained trifluralin concentration was measured by HPLC. This study proved the trifluralin removal of 92.90 ± 1.6% and 87.91 ± 19.22% for UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO processes in the best operation conditions (contact time of 60 min, the persulfate concentration of 40 μM, and the ZnO concentration of 100 mg/L). The optimal trifluraline concentrations were 1.2 mg/L and 0.6 mg/L for UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO processes, respectively. In both processes, the removal efficiency of trifluralin increased significantly with increasing contact time. The findings exhibited that both processes UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO followed the zero-order kinetic. The electrical energy consumed of UV/S2O82 and UV/ZnO was about 43.95 and 20.41 Kwh/kg, respectively. The results show that UV/S2O82− and ZnO/UV processes were appropriate as the effective treatment method for trifluralin removal. Therefore, it is proposed to study the performance of these processes as an environmentally friendly practice in full scale with real wastewater.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9964291
spellingShingle Fatemeh Sadeghi
Abdolmajid Fadaei
Fazel Mohammadi-Moghadam
Sara Hemati
Gashtasb Mardani
Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
title Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
title_full Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
title_fullStr Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
title_short Photocatalytic Degradation of Trifluralin in Aqueous Solutions by UV/S2O82− and UV/ZnO Processes: A Comparison of Removal Efficiency and Cost Estimation
title_sort photocatalytic degradation of trifluralin in aqueous solutions by uv s2o82 and uv zno processes a comparison of removal efficiency and cost estimation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9964291
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehsadeghi photocatalyticdegradationoftrifluralininaqueoussolutionsbyuvs2o82anduvznoprocessesacomparisonofremovalefficiencyandcostestimation
AT abdolmajidfadaei photocatalyticdegradationoftrifluralininaqueoussolutionsbyuvs2o82anduvznoprocessesacomparisonofremovalefficiencyandcostestimation
AT fazelmohammadimoghadam photocatalyticdegradationoftrifluralininaqueoussolutionsbyuvs2o82anduvznoprocessesacomparisonofremovalefficiencyandcostestimation
AT sarahemati photocatalyticdegradationoftrifluralininaqueoussolutionsbyuvs2o82anduvznoprocessesacomparisonofremovalefficiencyandcostestimation
AT gashtasbmardani photocatalyticdegradationoftrifluralininaqueoussolutionsbyuvs2o82anduvznoprocessesacomparisonofremovalefficiencyandcostestimation