Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated texts
The ability of chatbots to produce plausible, human-like responses raises questions about the extent of their similarity with original texts. Using a modified version of Halliday’s clause-complexing framework, this study compared 50 abstracts of scientific research articles from Nature with generate...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Leong Alvin Ping |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2023-12-01
|
Series: | ExELL (Explorations in English Language and Linguistics) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2023-0008 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Utilisation of ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence tools among medical faculty in Uganda: a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Job Kuteesa, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini (Bard) in medical inquiry: a scoping review
by: Fattah H. Fattah, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
ChatGPT, Bard, Bing Chat, and Claude generate feedback for Chinese as foreign language writing: A comparative case study
by: Saleh Obaidoon, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Human creation of abstracts with selected computer assistance tools
by: Timothy C. Craven
Published: (1998-01-01) -
Selectives (“topic markers”) on subordinate clauses
by: Wälchli Bernhard
Published: (2022-09-01)