Advancing Deliberative Discourse Measurement: The Intersection with Computational Abstract Argumentation in Discourse Quality Evaluations
This research investigates the potential of computational argumentation, specifically the application of the Abstract Argumentation Framework (AAF), to enhance the evaluation of deliberative quality in public discourse. It focuses on integrating AAF and its related semantics with the Discourse Quali...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sanjay Kumar, Jane Suiter, Luca Longo |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/3/204 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Argument from Ignorance and Argument from Silence
by: E. N. Lisanyuk, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Political discourse as practical reasoning: A case study of a British Prime Minister candidate speech
by: Lucyna Harmon
Published: (2017-12-01) -
A look at the rational arguments for the abstraction of the human soul from the perspective of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli
by: Ali Ghadrdangharamaleki, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Three Approaches to Criticisms and Support in Evaluation of Arguments
by: E. N. Lisanyuk
Published: (2022-04-01) -
AXIOLOGICAL GROUNDS OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE INTERNET DISCOURSE OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
by: S. V. Shevyakina
Published: (2021-09-01)