Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicola Bizzaro, Franco Franceschini, Maria Infantino, Carlo Selmi, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Francesca Motta, Davide Giavarina, Boaz Palterer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-01
Series:RMD Open
Online Access:https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e002817.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544755120078848
author Nicola Bizzaro
Franco Franceschini
Maria Infantino
Carlo Selmi
Gian Domenico Sebastiani
Francesca Motta
Davide Giavarina
Boaz Palterer
author_facet Nicola Bizzaro
Franco Franceschini
Maria Infantino
Carlo Selmi
Gian Domenico Sebastiani
Francesca Motta
Davide Giavarina
Boaz Palterer
author_sort Nicola Bizzaro
collection DOAJ
description Objective The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify specific subgroups of patients. The main objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the literature on the role of RF isotypes in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the role of RF isotypes in RA (only in English, from PubMed, search terms: “rheumatoid factor isotypes”, “diagnosis”, “prognosis” and “rheumatoid arthritis”, last search 31 July 2022, two independent assessment of quality and biases, results included in tables and in the meta-analysis).Results Thirty-six articles were examined (7517 patients). Testing all RF isotypes with latex test or nephelometry allows for the highest sensitivity (68.6%, 95% CI 66.2% to 71.0%); nonetheless, the determination of IgA isotype provides the highest specificity (91.4%, 95% CI 90.8% to 92.0%) and the highest positive likelihood ratio (7.7, 95% CI 5.7 to 10.4). When testing IgM isotype the highest diagnostic OR (21.7, 95% CI 16.1 to 29.3) is reached. When analysing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF isotype determination increases diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, these do not provide relevant prognostic information, as results are conflicting.Conclusions Testing RF allows the highest sensitivity, while IgA isotype the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio for RA diagnosis. On the other hand, determination of RF isotypes dose not allow prognostic information, as data are limited and heterogeneous.
format Article
id doaj-art-6cee7c4ab3054dd683d6fd7f9a1c322f
institution Kabale University
issn 2056-5933
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series RMD Open
spelling doaj-art-6cee7c4ab3054dd683d6fd7f9a1c322f2025-02-03T09:55:15ZengBMJ Publishing GroupRMD Open2056-59332023-08-019310.1136/rmdopen-2022-002817Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisNicola Bizzaro0Franco Franceschini1Maria Infantino2Carlo Selmi3Gian Domenico Sebastiani4Francesca Motta5Davide Giavarina6Boaz Palterer7Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Udine, Italy1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, ItalyLaboratory of Immunology and Allergology, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Firenze, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, ItalyUOC di Reumatologia, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Roma, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, ItalyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, St Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy1University of Florence, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Firenze, ItalyObjective The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify specific subgroups of patients. The main objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the literature on the role of RF isotypes in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the role of RF isotypes in RA (only in English, from PubMed, search terms: “rheumatoid factor isotypes”, “diagnosis”, “prognosis” and “rheumatoid arthritis”, last search 31 July 2022, two independent assessment of quality and biases, results included in tables and in the meta-analysis).Results Thirty-six articles were examined (7517 patients). Testing all RF isotypes with latex test or nephelometry allows for the highest sensitivity (68.6%, 95% CI 66.2% to 71.0%); nonetheless, the determination of IgA isotype provides the highest specificity (91.4%, 95% CI 90.8% to 92.0%) and the highest positive likelihood ratio (7.7, 95% CI 5.7 to 10.4). When testing IgM isotype the highest diagnostic OR (21.7, 95% CI 16.1 to 29.3) is reached. When analysing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF isotype determination increases diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, these do not provide relevant prognostic information, as results are conflicting.Conclusions Testing RF allows the highest sensitivity, while IgA isotype the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio for RA diagnosis. On the other hand, determination of RF isotypes dose not allow prognostic information, as data are limited and heterogeneous.https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e002817.full
spellingShingle Nicola Bizzaro
Franco Franceschini
Maria Infantino
Carlo Selmi
Gian Domenico Sebastiani
Francesca Motta
Davide Giavarina
Boaz Palterer
Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
RMD Open
title Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e002817.full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolabizzaro rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francofranceschini rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariainfantino rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carloselmi rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT giandomenicosebastiani rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francescamotta rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidegiavarina rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boazpalterer rheumatoidfactorisotypesinrheumatoidarthritisdiagnosisandprognosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis