Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 instruments. Method. A sample of myeloma patients (N=89) from two tertiary hospitals were surveyed with the QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20 and various demographic and disease related questions. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Kontodimopoulos, Alexandros Samartzis, Angelos A. Papadopoulos, Dimitris Niakas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842867
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558802756435968
author Nick Kontodimopoulos
Alexandros Samartzis
Angelos A. Papadopoulos
Dimitris Niakas
author_facet Nick Kontodimopoulos
Alexandros Samartzis
Angelos A. Papadopoulos
Dimitris Niakas
author_sort Nick Kontodimopoulos
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 instruments. Method. A sample of myeloma patients (N=89) from two tertiary hospitals were surveyed with the QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20 and various demographic and disease related questions. The previously validated Greek SF-36 instrument was used as a “gold standard” for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons. Hypothesized scale structure, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and various forms of construct validity (convergent, discriminative, concurrent and known-groups) were assessed. Results. Multitrait scaling confirmed scale structure of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20, with good item convergence (96% and 72%) and discrimination (78% and 58%) rates. Cronbach's α was >0.70 for all but one scale (cognitive functioning). Spearman's correlations between similar QLQ-C30 and SF-36 scales ranged between 0.35–0.80 (P<0.001). Expected interscale correlations and known-groups comparisons supported construct validity. QLQ-MY20 scales showed comparatively lower correlations with QLQ-C30 functional scales, and higher correlations with conceptually related symptom scales. Conclusions. The observed psychometric properties of the two instruments imply suitability for assessing myeloma HRQoL in Greece. Future studies should focus on generalizability of the results, as well as on specific issues such as longitudinal validity and responsiveness.
format Article
id doaj-art-6a48d01124aa4d7dab9bd4ee59de91d4
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-6a48d01124aa4d7dab9bd4ee59de91d42025-02-03T01:31:34ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/842867842867Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple MyelomaNick Kontodimopoulos0Alexandros Samartzis1Angelos A. Papadopoulos2Dimitris Niakas3School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Bouboulinas 57-59, 26222 Patras, GreeceSchool of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Bouboulinas 57-59, 26222 Patras, GreeceSchool of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Bouboulinas 57-59, 26222 Patras, GreeceSchool of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Bouboulinas 57-59, 26222 Patras, GreeceObjectives. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 instruments. Method. A sample of myeloma patients (N=89) from two tertiary hospitals were surveyed with the QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20 and various demographic and disease related questions. The previously validated Greek SF-36 instrument was used as a “gold standard” for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons. Hypothesized scale structure, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and various forms of construct validity (convergent, discriminative, concurrent and known-groups) were assessed. Results. Multitrait scaling confirmed scale structure of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20, with good item convergence (96% and 72%) and discrimination (78% and 58%) rates. Cronbach's α was >0.70 for all but one scale (cognitive functioning). Spearman's correlations between similar QLQ-C30 and SF-36 scales ranged between 0.35–0.80 (P<0.001). Expected interscale correlations and known-groups comparisons supported construct validity. QLQ-MY20 scales showed comparatively lower correlations with QLQ-C30 functional scales, and higher correlations with conceptually related symptom scales. Conclusions. The observed psychometric properties of the two instruments imply suitability for assessing myeloma HRQoL in Greece. Future studies should focus on generalizability of the results, as well as on specific issues such as longitudinal validity and responsiveness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842867
spellingShingle Nick Kontodimopoulos
Alexandros Samartzis
Angelos A. Papadopoulos
Dimitris Niakas
Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
The Scientific World Journal
title Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Greek QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
title_sort reliability and validity of the greek qlq c30 and qlq my20 for measuring quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842867
work_keys_str_mv AT nickkontodimopoulos reliabilityandvalidityofthegreekqlqc30andqlqmy20formeasuringqualityoflifeinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT alexandrossamartzis reliabilityandvalidityofthegreekqlqc30andqlqmy20formeasuringqualityoflifeinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT angelosapapadopoulos reliabilityandvalidityofthegreekqlqc30andqlqmy20formeasuringqualityoflifeinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT dimitrisniakas reliabilityandvalidityofthegreekqlqc30andqlqmy20formeasuringqualityoflifeinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma