Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study
Abstract BackgroundConcept maps are a suitable method for teaching clinical reasoning (CR). For example, in a concept map, findings, tests, differential diagnoses, and treatment options can be documented and connected to each other. When combined with virtual patients, automat...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Medical Education |
| Online Access: | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e57331 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832086437662556160 |
|---|---|
| author | Anja Mayer Inga Hege Andrzej A Kononowicz Anja Müller Małgorzata Sudacka |
| author_facet | Anja Mayer Inga Hege Andrzej A Kononowicz Anja Müller Małgorzata Sudacka |
| author_sort | Anja Mayer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Abstract
BackgroundConcept maps are a suitable method for teaching clinical reasoning (CR). For example, in a concept map, findings, tests, differential diagnoses, and treatment options can be documented and connected to each other. When combined with virtual patients, automated feedback can be provided to the students’ concept maps. However, as CR is a nonlinear process, feedback concept maps that are created together by several individuals might address this issue and cover perspectives from different health professionals.
ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to develop a collaborative process for creating feedback concept maps in virtual patient–based CR education.
MethodsHealth professionals of different specialties, nationalities, and levels of experience in education individually created concept maps and afterward reached a consensus on them in structured workshops. Then, medical students discussed the health professionals’ concept maps in focus groups. We performed a qualitative content analysis of the transcribed audio records and field notes and a descriptive comparison of the produced concept maps.
ResultsA total of 14 health professionals participated in 4 workshops, each with 3‐4 participants. In each workshop, they reached a consensus on 1 concept map, after discussing content and presentation, as well as rationales, and next steps. Overall, the structure of the workshops was well-received. The comparison of the produced concept maps showed that they varied widely in their scope and content. Consensus concept maps tended to contain more nodes and connections than individual ones. A total of 9 medical students participated in 2 focus groups of 4 and 5 participants. Their opinions on the concept maps’ features varied widely, balancing between the wish for an in-depth explanation and the flexibility of CR.
ConclusionsAlthough the number of participating health professionals and students was relatively low, we were able to show that consensus workshops are a constructive method to create feedback concept maps that include different perspectives of health professionals with content that is useful to and accepted by students. Further research is needed to determine which features of feedback concept maps are most likely to improve learner outcomes and how to facilitate their construction in collaborative consensus workshops. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-69af4b8b3363442d8c806d42a894167e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2369-3762 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-69af4b8b3363442d8c806d42a894167e2025-02-06T15:16:10ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Medical Education2369-37622025-01-0111e57331e5733110.2196/57331Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods StudyAnja Mayerhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-588XInga Hegehttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-5162Andrzej A Kononowiczhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-2093Anja Müllerhttp://orcid.org/0009-0002-0383-4169Małgorzata Sudackahttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-0325 Abstract BackgroundConcept maps are a suitable method for teaching clinical reasoning (CR). For example, in a concept map, findings, tests, differential diagnoses, and treatment options can be documented and connected to each other. When combined with virtual patients, automated feedback can be provided to the students’ concept maps. However, as CR is a nonlinear process, feedback concept maps that are created together by several individuals might address this issue and cover perspectives from different health professionals. ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to develop a collaborative process for creating feedback concept maps in virtual patient–based CR education. MethodsHealth professionals of different specialties, nationalities, and levels of experience in education individually created concept maps and afterward reached a consensus on them in structured workshops. Then, medical students discussed the health professionals’ concept maps in focus groups. We performed a qualitative content analysis of the transcribed audio records and field notes and a descriptive comparison of the produced concept maps. ResultsA total of 14 health professionals participated in 4 workshops, each with 3‐4 participants. In each workshop, they reached a consensus on 1 concept map, after discussing content and presentation, as well as rationales, and next steps. Overall, the structure of the workshops was well-received. The comparison of the produced concept maps showed that they varied widely in their scope and content. Consensus concept maps tended to contain more nodes and connections than individual ones. A total of 9 medical students participated in 2 focus groups of 4 and 5 participants. Their opinions on the concept maps’ features varied widely, balancing between the wish for an in-depth explanation and the flexibility of CR. ConclusionsAlthough the number of participating health professionals and students was relatively low, we were able to show that consensus workshops are a constructive method to create feedback concept maps that include different perspectives of health professionals with content that is useful to and accepted by students. Further research is needed to determine which features of feedback concept maps are most likely to improve learner outcomes and how to facilitate their construction in collaborative consensus workshops.https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e57331 |
| spellingShingle | Anja Mayer Inga Hege Andrzej A Kononowicz Anja Müller Małgorzata Sudacka Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study JMIR Medical Education |
| title | Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full | Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_fullStr | Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_short | Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient–Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_sort | collaborative development of feedback concept maps for virtual patient based clinical reasoning education mixed methods study |
| url | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e57331 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anjamayer collaborativedevelopmentoffeedbackconceptmapsforvirtualpatientbasedclinicalreasoningeducationmixedmethodsstudy AT ingahege collaborativedevelopmentoffeedbackconceptmapsforvirtualpatientbasedclinicalreasoningeducationmixedmethodsstudy AT andrzejakononowicz collaborativedevelopmentoffeedbackconceptmapsforvirtualpatientbasedclinicalreasoningeducationmixedmethodsstudy AT anjamuller collaborativedevelopmentoffeedbackconceptmapsforvirtualpatientbasedclinicalreasoningeducationmixedmethodsstudy AT małgorzatasudacka collaborativedevelopmentoffeedbackconceptmapsforvirtualpatientbasedclinicalreasoningeducationmixedmethodsstudy |