Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing

ABSTRACT The demand for lentiviral vectors (LVs) as tools for ex vivo gene therapies is ever‐increasing. Despite their promising applications, challenges in LV production remain largely due to the fragile envelope, which challenges the maintenance of vector stability. Thus, downstream processing opt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer J. Labisch, Maria Evangelopoulou, Tobias Schleuß, Andreas Pickl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2025-01-01
Series:Engineering in Life Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202400057
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581955776937984
author Jennifer J. Labisch
Maria Evangelopoulou
Tobias Schleuß
Andreas Pickl
author_facet Jennifer J. Labisch
Maria Evangelopoulou
Tobias Schleuß
Andreas Pickl
author_sort Jennifer J. Labisch
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The demand for lentiviral vectors (LVs) as tools for ex vivo gene therapies is ever‐increasing. Despite their promising applications, challenges in LV production remain largely due to the fragile envelope, which challenges the maintenance of vector stability. Thus, downstream processing optimization to enhance efficiency, yield, and product quality is necessary. This study investigated the influence of membrane types and filtration devices during ultrafiltration (UF). Nine different membrane materials consisting of polyethersulfone (PES), regenerated cellulose, or Hydrosart, with distinct molecular weight cutoffs, were evaluated in stirred cells, centrifugal ultrafilters, and crossflow cassettes. The evaluation was based on the ability to retain infectious LV particles and remove impurities. The analysis revealed that a reinforced 100 kDa PES and a 300 kDa Hydrosart membrane had the best overall ability to concentrate infectious LVs and remove DNA, especially when operated in a stirred cell. Challenges were seen in the nonoptimized crossflow cassette process, where infectious LV recovery was generally lower compared to other devices. We demonstrated that membrane material and filtration device have a direct impact on the efficiency of LV UF.
format Article
id doaj-art-63c6debeaf174c4b800069a76f95e13c
institution Kabale University
issn 1618-0240
1618-2863
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley-VCH
record_format Article
series Engineering in Life Sciences
spelling doaj-art-63c6debeaf174c4b800069a76f95e13c2025-01-30T06:40:30ZengWiley-VCHEngineering in Life Sciences1618-02401618-28632025-01-01251n/an/a10.1002/elsc.202400057Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector ProcessingJennifer J. Labisch0Maria Evangelopoulou1Tobias Schleuß2Andreas Pickl3Lab Essentials Applications Development Sartorius Göttingen GermanyLab Essentials Applications Development Sartorius Göttingen GermanyUltrafiltration Membrane Technology Sartorius Göttingen GermanyLab Essentials Applications Development Sartorius Göttingen GermanyABSTRACT The demand for lentiviral vectors (LVs) as tools for ex vivo gene therapies is ever‐increasing. Despite their promising applications, challenges in LV production remain largely due to the fragile envelope, which challenges the maintenance of vector stability. Thus, downstream processing optimization to enhance efficiency, yield, and product quality is necessary. This study investigated the influence of membrane types and filtration devices during ultrafiltration (UF). Nine different membrane materials consisting of polyethersulfone (PES), regenerated cellulose, or Hydrosart, with distinct molecular weight cutoffs, were evaluated in stirred cells, centrifugal ultrafilters, and crossflow cassettes. The evaluation was based on the ability to retain infectious LV particles and remove impurities. The analysis revealed that a reinforced 100 kDa PES and a 300 kDa Hydrosart membrane had the best overall ability to concentrate infectious LVs and remove DNA, especially when operated in a stirred cell. Challenges were seen in the nonoptimized crossflow cassette process, where infectious LV recovery was generally lower compared to other devices. We demonstrated that membrane material and filtration device have a direct impact on the efficiency of LV UF.https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202400057centrifugal ultrafilterscrossflow cassettesdownstream processinglentiviral vectorsstirred cellstangential flow filtration
spellingShingle Jennifer J. Labisch
Maria Evangelopoulou
Tobias Schleuß
Andreas Pickl
Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
Engineering in Life Sciences
centrifugal ultrafilters
crossflow cassettes
downstream processing
lentiviral vectors
stirred cells
tangential flow filtration
title Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
title_full Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
title_fullStr Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
title_short Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing
title_sort investigating ultrafiltration membranes and operation modes for improved lentiviral vector processing
topic centrifugal ultrafilters
crossflow cassettes
downstream processing
lentiviral vectors
stirred cells
tangential flow filtration
url https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202400057
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferjlabisch investigatingultrafiltrationmembranesandoperationmodesforimprovedlentiviralvectorprocessing
AT mariaevangelopoulou investigatingultrafiltrationmembranesandoperationmodesforimprovedlentiviralvectorprocessing
AT tobiasschleuß investigatingultrafiltrationmembranesandoperationmodesforimprovedlentiviralvectorprocessing
AT andreaspickl investigatingultrafiltrationmembranesandoperationmodesforimprovedlentiviralvectorprocessing