Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers

Many digital communication platforms of the new economy are built up on mechanisms to initially communicate and/or develop an acquaintance with “strangers” over displayed profile pictures. This study aims to reveal the impact of the direction of eye gaze and perceived dominance from those pictures d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beril Durmuş, Yonca Aslanbay, Murat Çinko, Aydin Erden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Marmara University 2022-12-01
Series:Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2448501
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585203691814912
author Beril Durmuş
Yonca Aslanbay
Murat Çinko
Aydin Erden
author_facet Beril Durmuş
Yonca Aslanbay
Murat Çinko
Aydin Erden
author_sort Beril Durmuş
collection DOAJ
description Many digital communication platforms of the new economy are built up on mechanisms to initially communicate and/or develop an acquaintance with “strangers” over displayed profile pictures. This study aims to reveal the impact of the direction of eye gaze and perceived dominance from those pictures during the process of pairing online with a stranger, for spending time in a closed environment. Preference between pairs of 66 participants through their profile pictures having a direct or averted gaze and some manipulated by facial width height ratio (fWHR) aiming to increase perceived dominance, were measured by the eye- tracking device. The findings show that when observing the profile pictures of strangers (i) gaze attracts attention to the face of gazing person, (ii) in case of perceived dominance, the gaze of a stranger induces gaze avoidance for participants. The study further predicted when the user is to prefer between pairs of people that one is perceived to be dominant, the probability of choosing the perceived non-dominant is higher. The participants’ preference of the former holdout sample was predicted consecutively by hit ratios of 81.5, 91.4 and 94.9 for three different cases. Analysis of the data revealed no systematic differences between males and females.
format Article
id doaj-art-630ee774286c4400a7c7a7e7e6bf54b4
institution Kabale University
issn 2630-6220
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Marmara University
record_format Article
series Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-630ee774286c4400a7c7a7e7e6bf54b42025-01-26T18:30:19ZengMarmara UniversityTürkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi2630-62202022-12-014118920210.17829/turcom.11216303Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with StrangersBeril Durmuş0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-9608Yonca Aslanbay1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-9600Murat Çinko2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-7482Aydin Erden3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-8335MARMARA UNIVERSITYISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITYMARMARA UNIVERSITYISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITYMany digital communication platforms of the new economy are built up on mechanisms to initially communicate and/or develop an acquaintance with “strangers” over displayed profile pictures. This study aims to reveal the impact of the direction of eye gaze and perceived dominance from those pictures during the process of pairing online with a stranger, for spending time in a closed environment. Preference between pairs of 66 participants through their profile pictures having a direct or averted gaze and some manipulated by facial width height ratio (fWHR) aiming to increase perceived dominance, were measured by the eye- tracking device. The findings show that when observing the profile pictures of strangers (i) gaze attracts attention to the face of gazing person, (ii) in case of perceived dominance, the gaze of a stranger induces gaze avoidance for participants. The study further predicted when the user is to prefer between pairs of people that one is perceived to be dominant, the probability of choosing the perceived non-dominant is higher. The participants’ preference of the former holdout sample was predicted consecutively by hit ratios of 81.5, 91.4 and 94.9 for three different cases. Analysis of the data revealed no systematic differences between males and females.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2448501online i̇letişimdikkati̇nsan yüzüalgıkarar almakaçınmadominantlıkonline communicationattentionhuman faceperceptiondecision makingavoidancedominanceonline i̇letişimdikkati̇nsan yüzüalgıkarar almakaçınmadominantlık
spellingShingle Beril Durmuş
Yonca Aslanbay
Murat Çinko
Aydin Erden
Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi
online i̇letişim
dikkat
i̇nsan yüzü
algı
karar alma
kaçınma
dominantlık
online communication
attention
human face
perception
decision making
avoidance
dominance
online i̇letişim
dikkat
i̇nsan yüzü
algı
karar alma
kaçınma
dominantlık
title Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
title_full Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
title_fullStr Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
title_full_unstemmed Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
title_short Eye Gaze and Dominance, Cues for Online Communication with Strangers
title_sort eye gaze and dominance cues for online communication with strangers
topic online i̇letişim
dikkat
i̇nsan yüzü
algı
karar alma
kaçınma
dominantlık
online communication
attention
human face
perception
decision making
avoidance
dominance
online i̇letişim
dikkat
i̇nsan yüzü
algı
karar alma
kaçınma
dominantlık
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2448501
work_keys_str_mv AT berildurmus eyegazeanddominancecuesforonlinecommunicationwithstrangers
AT yoncaaslanbay eyegazeanddominancecuesforonlinecommunicationwithstrangers
AT muratcinko eyegazeanddominancecuesforonlinecommunicationwithstrangers
AT aydinerden eyegazeanddominancecuesforonlinecommunicationwithstrangers