Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
Purpose. To present the outcomes of hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to compare with refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs). Methods. Three hundred twenty eyes (160 patients) underwent cataract surgery with randomized IOLs bilateral implantation. Changes in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8285637 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832559693087637504 |
|---|---|
| author | Agnieszka Dyrda Ana Martínez-Palmer Daniel Martín-Moral Amanda Rey Antonio Morilla Miguel Castilla-Martí Janny Aronés-Santivañez |
| author_facet | Agnieszka Dyrda Ana Martínez-Palmer Daniel Martín-Moral Amanda Rey Antonio Morilla Miguel Castilla-Martí Janny Aronés-Santivañez |
| author_sort | Agnieszka Dyrda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose. To present the outcomes of hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to compare with refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs). Methods. Three hundred twenty eyes (160 patients) underwent cataract surgery with randomized IOLs bilateral implantation. Changes in uncorrected and distance-corrected logMAR distance, intermediate and near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), presence of dysphotopsia, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results. Postoperative VA in the hybrid (OptiVis) group was improved in all distances (p<0.001). OptiVis acted superiorly to monofocal IOLs in UNVA and DCNVA (p<0.001 for both) and to refractive ones in DCNVA (p<0.005). Distance, mesopic, without glare CS in OptiVis was lower than in the monofocal group and similar to other MFIOLs. No differences in dysphotopsia pre- and postoperatively and spectacle independence in near for OptiVis and refractive MFIOLs were detected. OptiVis patients were more satisfied than those with monofocal IOLs (p=0.015). Conclusions. After cataract surgery, patients with OptiVis improved VA in all distances. Near and intermediate VA was better than monofocal, and DCNVA was better than the refractive group. CS was lower in OptiVis than in the monofocal group, but there was no difference between MFIOLs. Patient satisfaction was higher in OptiVis than in the monofocal group. This trial is registered with NCT03512626. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-61219d0e55a64f18bea8ac80be86743b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj-art-61219d0e55a64f18bea8ac80be86743b2025-02-03T01:29:23ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582018-01-01201810.1155/2018/82856378285637Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular LensesAgnieszka Dyrda0Ana Martínez-Palmer1Daniel Martín-Moral2Amanda Rey3Antonio Morilla4Miguel Castilla-Martí5Janny Aronés-Santivañez6Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario del Mar and Hospital de la Esperanza, Pompeu and Fabra University, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario del Mar and Hospital de la Esperanza, Pompeu and Fabra University, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario del Mar and Hospital de la Esperanza, Pompeu and Fabra University, Barcelona, SpainInstitut Català de Retina, Barcelona, SpainInstitut Català de Retina, Barcelona, SpainValles Ophthalmology Research, Hospital General de Catalunya, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario del Mar and Hospital de la Esperanza, Pompeu and Fabra University, Barcelona, SpainPurpose. To present the outcomes of hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to compare with refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs). Methods. Three hundred twenty eyes (160 patients) underwent cataract surgery with randomized IOLs bilateral implantation. Changes in uncorrected and distance-corrected logMAR distance, intermediate and near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), presence of dysphotopsia, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results. Postoperative VA in the hybrid (OptiVis) group was improved in all distances (p<0.001). OptiVis acted superiorly to monofocal IOLs in UNVA and DCNVA (p<0.001 for both) and to refractive ones in DCNVA (p<0.005). Distance, mesopic, without glare CS in OptiVis was lower than in the monofocal group and similar to other MFIOLs. No differences in dysphotopsia pre- and postoperatively and spectacle independence in near for OptiVis and refractive MFIOLs were detected. OptiVis patients were more satisfied than those with monofocal IOLs (p=0.015). Conclusions. After cataract surgery, patients with OptiVis improved VA in all distances. Near and intermediate VA was better than monofocal, and DCNVA was better than the refractive group. CS was lower in OptiVis than in the monofocal group, but there was no difference between MFIOLs. Patient satisfaction was higher in OptiVis than in the monofocal group. This trial is registered with NCT03512626.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8285637 |
| spellingShingle | Agnieszka Dyrda Ana Martínez-Palmer Daniel Martín-Moral Amanda Rey Antonio Morilla Miguel Castilla-Martí Janny Aronés-Santivañez Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Journal of Ophthalmology |
| title | Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_full | Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_fullStr | Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_short | Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_sort | clinical results of diffractive refractive hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8285637 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT agnieszkadyrda clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT anamartinezpalmer clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT danielmartinmoral clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT amandarey clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT antoniomorilla clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT miguelcastillamarti clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses AT jannyaronessantivanez clinicalresultsofdiffractiverefractivehybridmultifocalandmonofocalintraocularlenses |